Sex and the Single Steve

in #sex5 years ago

I have been watching this Israeli soap opera on Amazon Prime. It's about the love lives of a bunch of Orthodox Jews in Israel. This is funny because it's not the kind of show that I usually enjoy or follow. I do admit that part of the reason I started watching it was the chicks.

Only one of them is what I'd call exceptionally beautiful, but they all have very pretty eyes and nice busts. Jewish girls do tend to have nice busts...but here is the other funny thing. I have never dated a Jewish girl. Although I am half Jewish, and I look Jewish (although I have also been taken as Mexican or Italian), I have never gone out with one myself.

They are well within my dating preferences: dark hair, dark eyes, short, bigger busts.

Who have I gone out with?

For accounting purposes, I am not counting women that were one night stands or that money played the major part in being with them...i.e. meeting a topless dancer after her shift after dropping a wad at the titty bar, or PI bargirls. In addition, I did not have sex with all, or even MOST of the women I am counting here...this is just dating. I am not counting married women I had fliratious lunches with. Finally, this is inaccurate...I've been contemplating this post a couple of days, and I keep remembering women that I had completely forgotten about.

  • Not surprisingly, Latina women come in at the top. 22 that I can remember. A personal favorite, and I heartily recommend dating Latina women. Just be prepared for some hyperfeminine bursts of anger. It's not like all women don't have these, but Latinas top the list here ;> FWIW, every woman I have been in love with has been Latina.

  • What did surprise me is that I have dated 14 white women, who are number two in the count. I would have SWORN it would be Asian women. In any case, most of these women have been in my type...short and dark complected. On contemplation, most of the white women have been on the chubbier side as well. Not really a problem for me, but I don't understand why this would be limited to the white chicks (maybe for heavier boobage?). This is also the category where I have been "fixed up" the most. I was pressured into 4 of these dates, with the predictable failure rate for the following kind of exchange:

What does she look like?
You'll like her, she's pretty
OK, but what does she look like?
She's thin and has red hair
Nope, not interested. You know I like the dark meat
C'mon you two would work out great together
How big are her tits?
Jesus,don't ask that in front of my wife!
Look, she is a great girl, we'll double
Shit, you buy the first two rounds

  • Next up are Asian women, with 11 on the list. I would have bet on more, but I realized the paying filter kicked this back a bit. These tended to be longer periods of dating, and were mostly in my college days. In fact, almost half of them came directly out of the Japanese language classes I took. I kept blowing off college study for heavy drinking, and I ended up taking the first semester of Second Year Japanese 3 times before I passed it.

  • The black girls I dated (4 total) have all came out of the middle class. One was half Thai, and one was half-white. None of them was batshit leftist/democrat, from which I understand is fairly common in black women, but then again, I ditch women as soon as they utter the slightest socialist drivel, so this was pretty much a prescreened issue ;> One of these girls didn't last long because her dad did not like me one bit. It wasn't racial, but class snobbery. He was middle upper class, and he did not like that not only had I been in the military, but I had been enlisted! Oh, the horror. She was too much of a daddy's girl for me to stay in that situation.

  • 2 South Asians; one Indian, one Sikh. The Sikh was a topless dancer, and she was drop dead gorgeous. I had gotten two dances from her, and was stretching out the time she was sitting with me by being charming (well, as possible as THAT is for ME, ROFL). I guess it worked, because she asked me out. That girl loved her porn, but she was in the top three crazy ones of my life. It didn't last three weeks, becuase she outpaced me even with the shit I was pulling those days!

  • But no Jewish chicks. When I first got out of the Corps, there was a real beauty that was a social worker for my friend's kid. We flirted, and I remember his (my friend's) mom trying to set me and the social worker up. For the life of me, I have no idea why I didn't follow through. Maybe I was just enjoying being single, chasing women on 6th Street and going to the soiled doves if i didn't catch one, too much?

Then

When I was a young man, a friend of mine told me that every day that you didn't get laid was a day gone forever. Now and then, I am horrible at social situations, and double that with women, so I didn't get laid as much as I would have liked. I also preferred to pay for it when possible.

South Park had it right:

Chef: You see, chidren, sometimes a man needs to be with a woman.
But sometimes, when the lovin' is over, the woman just wants to talk and talk
and talk and talk.
[song]
But a prostitute is someone who would love you
No matter who you are, or what you look like.
Yes, it's true, children.
That's not why you pay a prostitute,
No, you don't pay her to stay, you pay her to leave afterwards.
That's why I pays a lot for prostitutes!

http://southpark.cc.com/clips/152431/prostitute

I was always never good at dating multiple girls at once; I always felt guilty, even before there was anything understood, AND I got jealous where I had no right to be.

Like I said, I'm pretty bad with people skills ;>

Now

These days, I am not in constant rut. It has given me time to think about sex and relationships. And here comes the common stereotype...the person who has had lots of happyfuntime in their youth preaching control, self-discipline, and family...once they are no longer "in the game"

I am not saying that one should be celibate outside of marriage, but that children and sexual diseases are the common results of an irresponsible sex life. I'm not going to go all professor mode with studies and links either, but I will state that FOR WOMEN, the more partners they have increases the chance they are unable to create satisfying happy pair bonds down the line. Perhaps it's not fair to women, but there are AT LEAST two things that come into play:

  • Women that don't have children tend to be less satisfied than women who do have them
  • Women who have a wider range of experience tend to be less satisfied then women who don't "know any better"
  • [Corollary:] An inexperienced woman (0-2 partners)is more likely to be satisfied with what's she got
  • [Corollary:] Women tend to have a greater affinity for their "first". look up the term "alpha widow" for an approximate description of this.

The very rigid definitions that most religions define for marriage have very solid socio-biological reasons. I'll go into redpill sexuality in another post one day. It's no picnic for men anyway...

  • Women are biologically programmed to get the best GENETIC donor, while at the same time SOCIALLY programmed to get the best SOCIAL partner.
  • Most men aren't top tier genetic material. Freed of marital restrictions, a LOT of women would be happy to be part of The Big Dog's harem...at least on one level
  • Having a lot of unhappy (unlaid) men in your society is a recipe for crackpot revolutionaries...A hooker in every pot!
  • The vast majority of people would be happy in a comfortable pair-bonded situation

So marriage tends to balance men's and women's needs out socially, as well providing a stable environment for raising rug rats

Obviously, this doesn't work for everyone. But it should definitely be considered when running around with your hormones bursting out your...ears...while trying to get a little rompypompy.

Sort:  

I appreciate your forthright and true confessions.

I read of something alarming regarding promiscuity recently, and thought I'd scare with.. er, share with you.

Microchimerism. What I read was that women carry DNA of men they've had sex with - all of them, whether they became pregnant or not - and this is found in their brain as little colonies of foreign cells.

I note recalling a verse in the Bible where Jesus states that folks that lie together are linked spiritually thereafter, and if this new information (I have not verified it independently) is true, it is more than spiritually. If microchimerism is a thing, it may well explain women often seeking leaders (and some consistency to the views of men that women are batshit crazy), and the historical tendency of men to be head of household, aside from other sexual dimorphisms.

Consider what this might mean psychologically, and in terms of hearing voices, multiple personalities, and etc. I then consider that my own cells may form such colonies independent of the general organization of the whole in my brain, and things only get silly thereafter. We don't like those ideas at all!

The most alarming thing to me about it (and I assume this may alarm you as well) is the thought of all those mini-me's stuck in the brains of my paramours of yesteryear. Given I recall my standards, all I can think is 'Poor bastards!'.

Thanks!

I think, that between the points you and @builderofcastles bring up, there is an immediate need for a followup post.

I was reserving some of these points for a more detailed "red pill" post, but I see how y'alls' views mesh so well with the personal side of things.

And sex is extremely personal LOL. It has a major impact on self judgment and personal satisfaction with life.

I had heard of Microchimerism, but I hadn't looked into any verification of it yet. One aspect that is completley new (and scary!) of this was your statement:

Consider what this might mean psychologically, and in terms of hearing voices, multiple personalities, and etc.

WOW

Those poor bastards indeed!

following that point then, it is possible that this is biological counterpart to reinforcing social mores, and another reason men resent "foreigners" sleeping with their women!

This is one thing i REALLY HATE about feminism.
If i started a group to help women, the first thing i would do is teach women about women.
But not even in "women's studies" do they bring up any of this important biologically proven stuff.

Things like, after 7 sexual partners, the chances of a happy marriage for a woman is nil.
Things like having a child changes your body AND YOUR BRAIN.
(postpartum depression is not things get out of balance, is that the mother has to learn her new emotional body)
Things like emotional vocabulary. Women, unlike men, live in emotions. They are turned on, all the time. So, women should have a vocabulary, and know them and their consequences.

And this isn't even going "red pilled" or "black pilled" these are just biology.
Haven't even started with hypergamy or solipsism.

Will look forward to more posts.

Loading...

:- ) very interesting read!

"i.e. acquisition of male DNA by a
woman while bearing a male fetus."

Not sure if that acquisition means from
the male fetus, or from someone who
slept w/a preg woman & left a deposit.

Microchimerism...that @valued-customer referred to
I haven't looked at the mechanics or even the science behind the claim...it IS an interesting claim tho

Hi @stevescoins!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 5.563 which ranks you at #541 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 199 contributions, your post is ranked at #77.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You've built up a nice network.
  • The readers like your work!
  • You have already shown user engagement, try to improve it further.

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.034
BTC 64231.88
ETH 3128.59
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.95