Nature and AI don't categorically exclude each other

in #spirituality5 years ago (edited)

The more we awaken the more we come to see that we can be in this world but not of this world.

The split between Artificial Intelligence and Nature is becoming more and more obvious on Earth but the core issue lies in the fact that we try too much to give meaning to things. Love ultimately is the pure creative Freedom we have. As such, any creation is always going to be an expression of Love. Our unique Soul Light might not resonate any longer with a certain creative expression but that's ok: it helps us to identify what we want instead. Where can we get that? Potentially anywhere in the Universe.

There are surely galaxies and planets out there where technology and nature aka AI versus emotions don't exclude each other but go hand in hand. What I am saying is that here on Earth it looks like AI and emotions cannot go hand in hand but are having an either-or relationship.

Robot Souls capable of having feelings and natural empathy surely are endemic to some places in the Universe. It is just that in this particular reality as we experience it right now on Earth, AI/robots and nature/Soul/emotions exclude each other.

Life is not confined to one expression.

Sort:  

AIs capable of having feelings is not imaginable now, but for sure within the next decades. You don´t have to search within the Universe (space) for it, but just be patient (time).
Besides, feelings are not needed to qualify for true life. There are even humans without feelings. Is considered rather psychopathic, but obviously possible.

Exactly!

Everything is consciousness and life. We have the immense tendency toward giving meaning: "Life means emotions and feelings" or "Life means water at the basis".

No, these are just particular life expressions, but the reason we set such prerequesites for life is that we look at ourselves and our needs, and from here draw conclusions for our species. And as many Humans consider themselves at the top of creation, it is very easy to generalise these conclusions as valid for everything in existence. But of course this couldn't be further from the truth, and even within the Human species alone needs are always changing.

A good test for the self-proclaimed “spiritual” to eat their words, “it’s all one.” ha!

Sure enough!

There is much hyprocrisy in spiritual communities, and personally I don't resonate with many concepts that have been associated with spirituality these days, eg. many conspiracies, Law of Attraction putting the mind over the Soul and some other beliefs.

Many people tend to judge according to their resonance.

When they resonate, that thing is "good".

When they don't resonate, that thing is "bad".

Nothing is better or worse, more valid or less valid, our cosciousness simply engages in an endless flow of change. ;)

there is surely more than biotic life, more than biotic consciousness, more than biotic intelligence. And nature does not stop where mans action beginns. One who sees only with the eyes will be blind for many things. There is life in machines and life in machine-human systems. The whole system is alife and expirencing it self through us, and through everything. Fact is that theories and paradigms dont get falsified, they get embarrassed out of the way. Someday it will be embarrassing to say there is no life outside of organism, like it is embarrassing to belief that there is only one solar system. But people strongly believed in it, some years ago. knowledge is knowledge and truth is truth. Since in the space of possibilitys and in the virtuality of the quantum field everything is true...

Sounds very sophisticated!

Yes, and our reality experience is shifting quicker and quicker. If we rewinded linear time back to the 1900, for instance, and showed these people images of our reality experience in 2018, merely judged by what they see with their eyes they would call it fictive and impossible because most of these items we have nowadays didn't exist back then and seemed too far away in their imagination compared to their own current reality experience. And this entire pattern is extremely accelerating nowadays, because such reality jumps are now taking place in much less time. Even compared to 2000, many things have changed in ways we would have declared fictive back then.

Imagine how things will have changed by 3500! Perhaps technology will be almost non-existant, or all will be hyper-technologised. If we were to be shown images of the 3500 era, we would most likely behave like those in 1900 would do to our current reality: that is absolutely fictive, I can't believe that!

The images would evoke too much an outlandish impression compared to our current reality experience. Hence, our mind can't process these gaps so that it dismisses any likelihood thereof, because it is the easiest thing to do to not get overwhelmed.

@alexaventuria You have received a 100% upvote from @steemconductor because this post did not use any bidbots and you have not used bidbots in the last 30 days!

Upvoting this comment will help keep this service running.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 64222.08
ETH 3135.29
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.99