You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: What Do You Think Is a Fair $TEEM Valuation
I'm sure I'm wrong in this, but I thought the actual value of Steem was the 'almost free' native advertisement capabilities of Steem.
Content creators come here attracted by the promise of revenue, and organisations purchase stake to reward those who produce content for them. We've seen it already a few times where companies offering a total prize pool of say 1300 Steem end up with 300+ posts, 300+ links to their Twitter, 50 videos written about them, etc... which, if it does help their SEO, is an extremely good value proposition.
I always assumed that the question isn't, what is the value is Steem, but instead, what is the value of Steemians. Aren't we the product?
There's known costs for that. So based on that it should be possible to calculate/estimate a fair market cap and thus token value?
In fat, isn't that what oracle-d is offering. Good old school SEO and SMM. All coming from the same IP for the SEO.
I thought they were positioning themselves more as a talent house for content creation... but yeah, probably.
Hmm, so what do you think a fair market cap for Steem is? Who is the target audience to buy tokens?
Yeah they don't have to be mutually exclusive. Steem can also be the new odesk.
Upvote creation or database entry rather than pay with liquids.
Stake is expensive though and requires a huge stake to truly power such operations. Especially at scale.