I'm going to take this in sequence because I've been seeing this theme repeated by so many people that seem lost in this wishful thinking.

First off, you've made the erroneous statement that equates decentralization with viability. The issues were concealed while crypto currency values were high and confidence was high.

On that note; any incorporated company that could, in one year, go from profitable to a 2 million dollar per year deficit... there should be talk of criminal investigations, not talk of not inviting people to speak. Priorities.

Then, under the gorilla, you are misapplying the term "decentralized" again... this time is a far worse misappropriation. What you are describing as a solution has a proper term: "Ponzi scheme", and YES, that is VERY criminal.

Your idea of the DApps being "products" in that sense is ALSO incorrect. The apps themselves might be a "product" in terms of users, but in terms of revenue, more apps does nothing to fix the lack of revenue.

Whoever has been the "benevolent dictator" has made EVERY error to build the platform and keep it as a sustainable model. Instead of looking to revenue streams, decisions were made to preclude that option, instead of looking to way to reduce costs there was a high market and plenty of confidence and instead of looking to solutions as things were scaling up the decisions were put off. When the decisions were finally made, it was a punishment to the new users for the benefit of investors.

I'm sorry to anyone that has invested in the platform, it could have been magical until greed got in the way.