You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: I never lose, either I win or I learn | or | STEEM after Haejin would the bid-bots win?
Both the original post as well as this reply to post are very good!
Again I wonder if it won't be possible to solve these issues? For example by starting all over again.
Although there are quite some things that need to be solved. There are also quite some things that are really lovely about Steemit. So I guess I hang around and make the best of it.
We dont need to start over away, we just need more commitment and to have an opportunity to try at least a little Our way to show some results and get the ball rolling... We have the user base, the token has value and we already have the people and the ideas...
Some support, a chance to pilot test is all it takes...
But if you don't start all over again, there is no possibility to get the financial wealth divided over more users. Right now basically less than 1% of the users has close to 99% of the financial value. That doesn't seem healthy. Or do you think it is?
It is not about redistribution of stake, it is about fair use of the rewards pool for what is was meant to.
Remember STEEM is market driven and the market forces will always govern the platform.
I don't understand your last sentence? What does it mean?
That this is not a social handout block-chain, stake will be always controlled by those able to buy it.
What we need as a solution is that those holding the stake, support those working to make the social network part of the block-chain into a sustainable great user experience and encourage growth and user education, reinvestment and quality.
Investing in STEEM is part of a business, as an investor i need the token to hold and store value.
As an user I need to be rewarded proportionally to my effort towards creating content that brings value (proof of brain)
As a witness shitposting and comment farming and general spam increase the operational costs of providing infrastructure.
The problems are different from where one stands... I happen to stand in those three points of view, so i can appreciate the difficulties of matching them into a common goal/way.