Such a bad idea. Allowing people to depend on income is a bad vision for the platform. It should be focused on engaging casual user who posts occasionally like Reddit. Oh well maybe hf28 will get it right.
Such a bad idea. Allowing people to depend on income is a bad vision for the platform. It should be focused on engaging casual user who posts occasionally like Reddit. Oh well maybe hf28 will get it right.
Who depends on income here? I think you haven't really understood that vision yet...;)
judging by much of the content I skim through, the hope for income does represent many peoples motivation
Sure! It's a motivation - but not a dependency. How could you depend on something that doesn't exist :) I by myself couldn't make a living of steemit incomes and I am not doing bad here. Maybe in the future it could be like this, but not now. Until then we should focus on building great brands that will payout in the future.
That's at least my point of view 😉
Referring to this
The scaling changes in HF17 are critically essential if we are to grow to even a fraction of the size of reddit.
The changes were made out of scalability requirements, not explicitly to allow people to depend on predictable income. That's just a side effect.
A better way of putting it would be "to make reward amounts more predictable for both voters and publishers alike".
Thanks for your response