You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Distributing Wealth Should Be Equally Profitable
It's inaccurate to equate the proposal to "taking away from the authors and giving to those that have large upvotes".
It's inaccurate to equate the proposal to "taking away from the authors and giving to those that have large upvotes".
Its rather a figure of speech or its a lapsus from my part in explaining my position. You arent "taking away", but you are creating a system that is even more focused towards accumulation of wealth in the hands of the wealthy. I dont think that should be the case.
The problem here is the stake based reward system. I have high hopes for SMTs and their 1 account/ 1 vote system Ned intends to move towards.
It has its own problems, but maybe then we wont need to rely on whale support. If SMTs werent a thing i probably wouldnt be giving my critical opinion on a large account like yours. haha. :D
No one can tell if you're a dog or cat on the internet, even the blockchain..
edit: and extrapolate a few years down when most people aren't gonna give out their votes.
Well it was nice talking to you, regardless if i agree or not. Off to tell Grumpycat he is wrong about something. See how it goes. hahaha.
See ya round. ;)
Lol btw to clarify, I'm liking that 1 account / 1 vote system as well. It's value, security, scalability etc will depend on use case.
Kev, i read this post linked below. I think you might find it interesting. Its not really connected to our convo, but since you are a manual curator im pretty sure you will find this very "frustrating" if you arent already aware of the practice.
See ya.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@firedream/another-way-of-milking-the-system