Not sure if the 2/3 is a good thing or a bad thing! I know steemians are generous but damn! I really do believe in this project and think that UBI will be soemthing we look at in the future and perhaps we can take a lot of the learnings from SBI to create a reliable model that serves the people in their best interest
Posted using Partiko iOS
We have a pretty firm base now that will help us gradually grow into a more complete basic income (growing up from the experimental stage).
2/3 is good in that it illustrates that we do have the potential to make positive impact even for people not paying anything to participate. It's also bad because that means 2/3 of our members haven't bought into the vision and made a commitment to boost their own basic income and that of others.
I think the higher the number of participant that never enroll themselves is overall good. You are not meant to be an investment anyway. Also if they are hunting for shares there's a nice chance they are buying into the vision too.
Hunting for shares is a really good point. They may be committed but with fewer resources, and actively entering all the contests instead. That's win-win-win for everyone!
You just planted 0.11 tree(s)!
Thanks to @fuadsm
We have planted already
8314.77 trees
out of 1,000,000
Let's save and restore Abongphen Highland Forest
in Cameroonian village Kedjom-Keku!
Plant trees with @treeplanter and get paid for it!
My Steem Power = 24759.63
Thanks a lot!
@martin.mikes coordinator of @kedjom-keku