You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Developing a STEEM Contribution Score Table
Great idea, but I think the timeframe must be must longer (I would put the ideal value at 1 full month). One day is really a too short window to correctly asses the activity on a given account.
The problem is with the different apps that are now on Steem and also different behaviours that are not easily identifiable via an algorithm :
- People are sometimes really active on various Discords and not that much here on Steemit, how to weigh that "external" activity ?
- Some witnesses aren't posting a lot, but are still big contributors to Steem,
- Some people aren't posting that much, but still offer great content when they do (example of DeepDive articles who require a lot of work hence a minimal activity),
- How to asses DLive because the chat during the video (and the numbers of viewers) are not put on the blockchain, so all DLivers will have approximatively the same profile (except for the rewards) ?
- How to assess developers ? (Who contribute via Utopian or not). A lot don't publish or comment much, but their contributions to Steem can be great.
- How to evaluate strange behaviours (circle voters who still put out genuine posts on one account) ?
PS : How can I check one particular account on your tool ? I'm not familiar with MS BI...
at the moment you can not check on particular account with this tool, but I have it on the list :-)
"People are sometimes really active on various Discords and not that much here on Steemit, how to weigh that "external" activity ?"
I think discord is a problem for steemit. You see there are still no community features on steemit, but when hivemind launches then I hope all discussion will move from discord to steemit.
"Some witnesses aren't posting a lot, but are still big contributors to Steem"
This is not in line with the whitepaper statement above. Yes there are contributing and adding value, but this contribution score is for active ON the blockchain, not around it.
"Some people aren't posting that much, but still offer great content when they do (example of DeepDive articles who require a lot of work hence a minimal activity)"
the data points are weighted a different values. Posting is only one aspect of making steemit great.
"How to asses DLive because the chat during the video (and the numbers of viewers) are not put on the blockchain, so all DLivers will have approximatively the same profile (except for the rewards)"
Again, we are rewarding activity on the block, not off the block. those with steemit accounts can post comments to dive streems or videos that are on the block. I'm not to interested in those that have not yet signed up to steemit.
"How to assess developers ? (Who contribute via Utopian or not). A lot don't publish or comment much, but their contributions to Steem can be great."
again we are looking at activity on the block not around the block.
"How to evaluate strange behaviours (circle voters who still put out genuine posts on one account) ?"
I can not share this with you at the moment, but I have a way!
Thanks for your response.
If it's only based on the activity "on the block" it's great. I would love to have a tool to see the engagement score (as it seems similar to @abh12345 engagement league formula) of anyone I want to check.
The only problem I see is that if the tool is used by a lot of people to upvote or follow (and as a consequence being on the Leaderboard of that list has a certain return value), some will find a way to make it to the top by reverse engineering the formula and abusing it, but that's the price of glory.
Looking forward to be able to check the score of anyone with a Steemit account, I won't be able to help point out discrepancies in the formula before having access to that.
lol wont be sharing the formula :-)