TOP 200 effective Steemit curators for the last week (2017.08.28-2017.09.03)

TOP 200 effective Steemit curators for the last week (2017.08.28-2017.09.03)

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

image source

---

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales.

But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish
interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

---

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published their posts for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

---

18456 authors published their posts during this week.

39282 accounts participated in the content curating according to information from the database.

1908368 votes were made during this week.

347554,62 SBD - is the total author rewards for this week.

---

TOP-200 effective curators for for the last week (2017.08.28-2017.09.03)

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@pharesim	6199	2643	0	3360,62	0,97	481,26
2	@hendrikdegrote	1045	553	6	15206,37	4,38	455,63
3	@randowhale	3971	1251	3	4948,72	1,42	335,44
4	@minnowbooster	1990	937	5	4492,49	1,29	228,08
5	@good-karma	5798	1745	1	2340,09	0,67	221,25
6	@randowhale1	2648	1028	3	3322,06	0,96	185,04
7	@booster	1791	510	3	5805,96	1,67	160,44
8	@blocktrades	174	140	22	16209,35	4,66	122,96
9	@roelandp	3522	2044	1	1064,14	0,31	117,85
10	@wackou	893	475	10	3370,9	0,97	86,76
11	@abit	276	98	22	15979,12	4,6	84,85
12	@hr1	1331	665	10	2277,63	0,66	82,07
13	@tamim	746	322	21	4389,87	1,26	76,59
14	@trafalgar	560	265	9	4471,33	1,29	64,2
15	@sweetsssj	589	181	9	6394,67	1,84	62,71
16	@lafona-miner	833	452	10	2307,17	0,66	56,5
17	@htliao	725	216	10	4629,11	1,33	54,18
18	@randowhalebonus	2687	885	4	1127,01	0,32	54,04
19	@curie	1043	551	6	1612,51	0,46	48,14
20	@tumutanzi	559	202	11	4127,99	1,19	45,18
21	@acidyo	259	198	18	4020,25	1,16	43,13
22	@bue	3518	2099	100	374,21	0,11	42,56
23	@minnowsupport	5102	1401	1	550,14	0,16	41,76
24	@donkeypong	526	230	12	3110,25	0,89	38,76
25	@surpassinggoogle	308	172	16	3700,77	1,06	34,49
26	@fminerten	413	138	26	4464,9	1,28	33,39
27	@timsaid	516	278	12	2148,26	0,62	32,36
28	@ausbitbank	375	231	12	2492,35	0,72	31,19
29	@linuslee0216	483	132	12	4324,32	1,24	30,93
30	@cervantes	627	342	14	1588,09	0,46	29,43
31	@bellyrub	871	370	6	1368,12	0,39	27,43
32	@kushed	1221	584	7	803,22	0,23	25,42
33	@anwenbaumeister	1048	554	6	813,36	0,23	24,41
34	@slowwalker	307	198	20	2265,65	0,65	24,31
35	@teamsteem	695	178	6	2514,11	0,72	24,25
36	@ramengirl	279	143	14	3073,11	0,88	23,81
37	@analisa	526	230	12	1769,19	0,51	22,05
38	@promoted	859	468	7	861,99	0,25	21,86
39	@meerkat	1045	553	6	714,06	0,21	21,4
40	@newhope	891	390	8	974,78	0,28	20,6
41	@ripperone	967	409	8	918,28	0,26	20,35
42	@thejohalfiles	125	59	27	6159,42	1,77	19,69
43	@canadian-coconut	276	121	17	2860,24	0,82	18,75
44	@gavvet	410	96	13	3184,67	0,92	16,57
45	@joele	2777	1434	2	210,33	0,06	16,34
46	@dunia	1044	552	6	543,44	0,16	16,25
47	@kpine	394	38	34	6565,14	1,89	13,52
48	@vcelier	359	220	16	1134,03	0,33	13,52
49	@xaero1	189	96	39	2509,36	0,72	13,05
50	@kevinwong	625	207	12	1156,62	0,33	12,97
51	@glitterfart	100	66	63	3214,31	0,92	11,49
52	@liberosist	227	160	36	1180,26	0,34	10,23
53	@adsactly	89	52	41	3445,26	0,99	9,71
54	@fuzzyvest	157	62	36	2848,74	0,82	9,57
55	@xeldal	290	159	13	1069,27	0,31	9,21
56	@mangos	793	365	8	457,13	0,13	9,04
57	@hanshotfirst	536	226	12	702,22	0,2	8,6
58	@nicolemoker	160	65	19	2425,54	0,7	8,54
59	@heiditravels	597	335	14	456,52	0,13	8,29
60	@pgarcgo	595	334	14	453,72	0,13	8,21
61	@gargon	592	332	14	447,7	0,13	8,05
62	@twinner	699	241	8	599,27	0,17	7,83
63	@minorityreport	809	240	10	600,4	0,17	7,81
64	@nanzo-scoop	652	97	12	1466,12	0,42	7,71
65	@skan	172	116	35	1195,62	0,34	7,51
66	@kingscrown	205	95	15	1424,99	0,41	7,33
67	@ats-david	148	65	27	2037,26	0,59	7,18
68	@shaka	172	127	41	1023,69	0,29	7,04
69	@oldstone	185	99	49	1254,81	0,36	6,73
70	@freeyourmind	716	123	6	1004,68	0,29	6,7
71	@someonewhoisme	700	120	5	956,8	0,28	6,22
72	@roomservice	2680	997	2	114,91	0,03	6,21
73	@ace108	749	204	13	555,05	0,16	6,14
74	@livingfree	372	55	30	2013,72	0,58	6
75	@v4vapid	111	54	30	2022,06	0,58	5,92
76	@officialfuzzy	178	74	36	1472,29	0,42	5,9
77	@aiqabrago	446	202	22	528,88	0,15	5,79
78	@bitcoiner	2485	1257	2	84,39	0,02	5,75
79	@snowflake	655	112	5	935,47	0,27	5,68
80	@leesunmoo	182	85	83	1206,52	0,35	5,56
81	@done	122	69	44	1460,72	0,42	5,46
82	@midnas-howler	214	160	18	617,25	0,18	5,35
83	@planter	204	136	29	715	0,21	5,27
84	@levycore	605	247	15	365,43	0,11	4,89
85	@esteemapp	5146	1713	1	52,53	0,02	4,88
86	@damarth	122	108	35	806,45	0,23	4,72
87	@feruz	5167	1713	1	50,79	0,01	4,71
88	@chitty	485	220	32	378,91	0,11	4,52
89	@cryptoctopus	203	82	27	961,61	0,28	4,27
90	@elyaque	1080	631	2	114,23	0,03	3,91
91	@anu	320	210	7	341,29	0,1	3,88
92	@tincho	593	332	7	213,77	0,06	3,85
93	@s4s	159	71	41	992,2	0,29	3,82
94	@justtryme90	297	189	20	371,69	0,11	3,81
95	@corn113	294	117	37	578,53	0,17	3,67
96	@swisswatcher	2536	1298	2	51,13	0,01	3,6
97	@dragonslayer109	520	175	12	368,53	0,11	3,49
98	@enki	417	269	6	228,68	0,07	3,33
99	@stackin	902	294	5	207,83	0,06	3,31
100	@zahnspange	377	116	18	515,47	0,15	3,24
101	@woo7739	252	107	34	556,56	0,16	3,23
102	@theprophet0	102	23	86	2575,94	0,74	3,21
103	@drotto	2829	1205	1	49,11	0,01	3,21
104	@snow-airline	421	184	16	312,38	0,09	3,11
105	@roadscape	76	53	16	1050,59	0,3	3,02
106	@team	506	356	10	154,51	0,04	2,98
107	@jackkang	107	104	47	517,89	0,15	2,92
108	@knozaki2015	538	136	11	384,95	0,11	2,84
109	@rok-sivante	141	87	93	600,9	0,17	2,83
110	@matt-a	110	73	42	713,1	0,21	2,82
111	@ghasemkiani	947	639	7	80,39	0,02	2,78
112	@twinbraid	403	158	32	319,81	0,09	2,74
113	@fatboy	130	114	36	431,32	0,12	2,66
114	@reggaemuffin	121	22	50	2183,33	0,63	2,6
115	@discordia	483	176	11	270,44	0,08	2,58
116	@aizensou	401	127	21	372,18	0,11	2,56
117	@bcc	148	76	40	621,8	0,18	2,56
118	@pfunk	101	67	36	700,49	0,2	2,54
119	@yoon	381	197	18	230,52	0,07	2,46
120	@venti	409	208	15	212,01	0,06	2,39
121	@brahma	920	533	8	81,85	0,02	2,36
122	@adept	322	258	22	168,82	0,05	2,36
123	@speda	1233	150	25	289,63	0,08	2,35
124	@tomiscurious	700	559	10	75,09	0,02	2,27
125	@buildawhale	593	222	9	183,66	0,05	2,21
126	@broncnutz	136	93	37	439,09	0,13	2,21
127	@sinnanda2627	387	184	19	219,63	0,06	2,19
128	@pmartynov	1981	234	10	170,14	0,05	2,16
129	@oldtimer	146	69	31	578,46	0,17	2,16
130	@jgcastrillo19	593	331	14	116,03	0,03	2,08
131	@lastminuteman	1132	669	2	57,1	0,02	2,07
132	@deanliu	190	79	79	480,84	0,14	2,06
133	@zeartul	112	73	43	518,84	0,15	2,05
134	@cheftony	2185	663	3	56,42	0,02	2,03
135	@btu	134	68	41	547,41	0,16	2,02
136	@leomichael	338	183	16	202,53	0,06	2,01
137	@woosungchoi	1339	238	5	155,75	0,04	2,01
138	@penguinpablo	289	130	19	284,17	0,08	2
139	@fyrstikken	1321	421	1	87,77	0,03	2
140	@fabien	167	78	99	450,79	0,13	1,91
141	@fabio	384	130	16	264,97	0,08	1,87
142	@thisvsthis	117	53	14	648,4	0,19	1,86
143	@gogumacat	99	38	65	904,68	0,26	1,86
144	@meysam	2276	1139	4	29,02	0,01	1,79
145	@webdeals	633	217	9	151,14	0,04	1,78
146	@abdullar	65	36	61	900,95	0,26	1,76
147	@hebrew	155	82	40	378,06	0,11	1,68
148	@stellabelle	73	48	95	635,32	0,18	1,65
149	@sochul	196	78	45	389,71	0,11	1,65
150	@leesol	288	163	24	184,42	0,05	1,63
151	@anyx	394	120	16	245,75	0,07	1,6
152	@gringalicious	200	90	32	328,85	0,09	1,6
153	@kim066	235	98	36	297,13	0,09	1,58
154	@ioc	90	21	95	1360,8	0,39	1,55
155	@aomura	248	125	100	226,98	0,07	1,54
156	@anotherjoe	515	101	16	279,29	0,08	1,53
157	@steemprentice	1488	715	3	38,8	0,01	1,5
158	@daveks	218	114	35	242,92	0,07	1,5
159	@jason	1693	254	7	107,24	0,03	1,48
160	@sandra	1697	225	9	120,5	0,03	1,47
161	@shawnfishbit	1206	721	4	37,61	0,01	1,47
162	@proctologic	3381	663	2	40,24	0,01	1,45
163	@vortac	138	40	34	659,36	0,19	1,43
164	@nettybot	607	184	9	143,09	0,04	1,43
165	@barrydutton	267	156	23	168	0,05	1,42
166	@michaeldavid	547	53	5	492,42	0,14	1,41
167	@msp-creativebot	497	94	13	273,32	0,08	1,39
168	@romedog	371	113	15	224,63	0,06	1,38
169	@czechglobalhosts	111	37	50	687,45	0,2	1,38
170	@titin	593	331	14	76,99	0,02	1,38
171	@ihashfury	2486	679	3	36,09	0,01	1,33
172	@lukestokes	103	43	68	569,26	0,16	1,33
173	@geoffrey	145	90	29	271,48	0,08	1,32
174	@morning	118	70	56	343,84	0,1	1,3
175	@onequality	124	77	34	310,87	0,09	1,3
176	@lichtblick	265	136	19	174,21	0,05	1,28
177	@cljg918	98	38	72	615,74	0,18	1,27
178	@meesterboom	312	139	22	168,78	0,05	1,27
179	@dyuryul	137	38	51	617,88	0,18	1,27
180	@arunava	1448	402	4	57,85	0,02	1,26
181	@warofcraft	371	321	15	70,95	0,02	1,23
182	@exyle	77	40	54	567,83	0,16	1,23
183	@papa-pepper	177	98	54	231,29	0,07	1,23
184	@wartrapa	596	333	14	67,75	0,02	1,22
185	@steemed	30	9	100	2439,49	0,7	1,19
186	@ehiboss	211	107	51	203,38	0,06	1,18
187	@ramta	131	34	17	637,76	0,18	1,17
188	@dse	112	65	61	325,78	0,09	1,15
189	@nextgencrypto	678	428	2	48,92	0,01	1,13
190	@joseph	377	123	14	168,56	0,05	1,12
191	@completelyanon	781	603	5	33,47	0,01	1,09
192	@robrigo	142	97	100	202,75	0,06	1,07
193	@bobbylee	351	38	99	521,17	0,15	1,07
194	@hansikhouse	146	83	39	238,62	0,07	1,07
195	@allyouneedtoknow	1370	809	5	24,24	0,01	1,06
196	@tradeqwik	437	71	7	276,24	0,08	1,06
197	@msp-lovebot	752	119	16	162,72	0,05	1,05
198	@doitvoluntarily	207	107	65	179,16	0,05	1,04
199	@marginshort	182	76	63	252,1	0,07	1,04
200	@danknugs	678	428	2	44,79	0,01	1,04

---

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit.

---

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.