@rok-sivante As lame as it is, I believe it is intentional and not a glitch. @creatr has lamented this before, several months earlier. I'm not sure if Steemit, Inc. made the decision in order to make the site somehow run smoother/faster or if they think 1 year old+ posts are "irrelevant."

Either way, I would like to see this addressed. Part of the blockchain's point for me is that the content is always preserved and accessible, so why would you build a front end that manually expires it? There are still so many issues with mainline 'Steemit.com' that are barriers to wider adoption.