An Ancient Middle Finger Will Change The History

in #steemit6 years ago (edited)

bi4c07lhwlspyuxs8lhn.jpg

It's just a lone, bony middle finger, but the scientists who found it say it's the oldest directly dated fossil of our species to ever be found outside of Africa and the Levant, a region that today comprises Israel, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan. But the new discovery is not without its critics, who say older evidence of human habitation outside of this region exists elsewhere, and that the finger might not even be human.
Like Zalmout, the Cambridge researchers concluded that the fossil - a 3.2cm-long adult middle finger - belonged to Homo sapiens. The finger, the Australian researchers concluded, was 88,000 years old.

Source: www.gizmodo.com.au

This shows that Darwin's theory of evolution of man was "scientifically wrong". Now we will start asking the same questions about the human origins, about religions and about our past. What I mean by past is millions of years ago. Many people find this topic troubling when viewed from a religious perspective. 70% of what we learn in the schools about our history doesnt make any sense. There are species alive today that did not live in the distant past and others who used to roam the Earth that are no longer with us. There is a big gap and a missing part of history, that nobody can explain. If modern humans lived on this planet millions of years ago, where did they go! Did they master the technology of time travel or were they so advanced to find other better planets? Our ancient history refers to ancient spaceships and ancient technology that we dont have these days.

antichi_astronauti_alieni.jpg

Darwin’s theory of evolution states that evolution happens by natural selection. Where species that are poorly adapted to their environment are less likely to survive and reproduce, while species with characteristics best suited to their environment are more likely to survive and pass their genes on to their children. According to his theory, all living things are descended from one or a few common ancestors. Now the questions is: Which ancestors!? Homo Erectus, Homo Habilis, Homo Rudolfensis... It is a long list! Or maybe the other ancestors in other planets! What about area 51 and all the ancient stories about the Gods who came from the sky...

This shows that Darwin's theory of evolution of man was "scientifically wrong". Now we will start asking the same questions about the human origins, about religions and about our past. What I mean by past is at least 1 million years ago. Many people find this topic troubling when viewed from a religious perspective. 70% of what we learn in the schools about our history doesnt make any sense. There are species alive today that did not live in the distant past and others who used to roam the Earth that are no longer with us.

k.PNG

In the past years our scientists found evidence of human like us, existed millions of years ago. What make us look at that chart above and think if we should believe everything science says.

After watching this video, you will realize that not everything we hear from scientists is always the truth.

Sources: www.bbc.co.uk, www.youtube.com, www.gizmodo.com.au, www.enricobaccarini.com

DQme43f1gVRkXJUiGKU4EQTBe9TgSPmft6AxuPFpp8aQRug.png

up.PNG

Sort:  

Science is a branch of knowledge which never declares that the theory it has propounded, is the utmost truth. On the other hand religions propound that everything which is in their book is unalterable and can never be changed. This is the great difference between both the field. One theory of science may be proved wrong but as science is not dogmatic, it helps to correct and rectify it's own mistake while religion cannot tolerate even a slight deviation from their doctrine. That's why science is great.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.034
BTC 64136.70
ETH 3128.20
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.94