If you add a 50/50 split you are taking away 25% of a chance to a minnow to grow on the site, and giving whales 25 % of extra earnings, on the other hand it may encourage them (whales) to vote more for quality content. Just my opinion.
If you add a 50/50 split you are taking away 25% of a chance to a minnow to grow on the site, and giving whales 25 % of extra earnings, on the other hand it may encourage them (whales) to vote more for quality content. Just my opinion.
It's a double edged sword. Authors don't make anything if curators don't curate. Block trades argued that with better duration inventive, organic good curating will make renting delegated power not just about self voting "horseshit" posts.
Yeah! Its all about investment and upvoting own post right,
I will lease sp and profit from it! So its all about money,
What do you think that from 50/50 first rewards system but we upgrade to 75/25 and then lets go back to level 1 again for 50/50 would work better?
I think I agree to this. If there ate no great contents... There is no steem. So I think the authors deserve more. 75/25 is best!
People have been spoilt beyond belief, they also feel an unjustified sense of entitlement. Adjusting the rewards to 50/50 split simply means more curators with significant power have more incentive to vote. This is probably a net positive for authors who actually post good material, as they will be the become the benefactors of more votes from better curators.
They could use Steemfollower, manually curate and get profits from their votes while curating.
Wow I think I buy your point . Nice one!