You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit took down @thedarkoverlord
You basically demand that Steemit, a registered commercial company, should risk prosecution and elimination to publish a blackmailing hacker. No sane CEO would do that, and if @ned would, I would seriously question his management abilities.
Steemit inc. has the full rights to remove that content and to banish the user. As others pointed out, it'll still be on the blockchain and other frontends can decide otherwise if they want. The game is called free market... If there is more gain than loss in publishing that stuff, there'll be publishers. If not, not.
I don't demand anything. I'm just pointing out that STINC looks the same as Facebook, while they are claiming that they are different.
@ned already proved incompetent in his recent fiasco.
I'm not discussing STINC's rights, I'm pointing out that they are creating gap between Steem and Steemit. But somebody already wrote, that's actually good thing. That's one more step in Steemit not being #1 interface to Steem. Like right now, I'm writing this from Busy.org.
"You basically demand". Vs "You demand". facepalm.
You basically demand that they shouldn't remove blackmailing hackers. Nough said.
To you, removing blackmailing hackers from the front end is the same as the censorship FB does, as you indicate that there's no difference. Nough said.
Posted using Partiko Android