You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why We Should Flag Garbage Supported By Absentee Delegators

in #steemit6 years ago (edited)

really comes down to the BIG whales; the ones the devs set up from the start.

the devs ought to be specific about what is spam and/or abuse, and what is not, and hire people to flag spam from those accounts. Or perhaps to set up and fund an account specifically for countering spam/abuse.

the goal here was for a community driven selection of good content; obviously the continuation of posts like this acknowledges the problems obtaining that goal with the current set up.

No system is perfect, and there will never be a perfect balance between allowing people to use their invested SP at will and a platform free from spam and abuse.

However, that means that the platform accounts have a community responsibility to act on specific problems

Sort:  

I cannot support top-down “policy,” as such, but wish some of these cats would take their delegation seriously. The free market—the freer it is—weeds out disproportionately rewarded content.

Consider it as the big wigs using their personal curation power, but I do undertsnad what you're saying.

I was trying to update my comment to reflect that point, but it took until after you commented to get through ;>

Haha. Don’t get me wrong. I think you raise some very valid points.

And if the initial investors do not take their investment seriously, it will tank.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.29
TRX 0.12
JST 0.034
BTC 63578.68
ETH 3314.57
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.94