You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Proposing Steem Equality 0.19.0 as the Next Fork

in #steemit7 years ago (edited)

My instinct is that a linear curve would be a very good change.

If consensus is difficult to achieve we can move it down slowly over time, but my guess is that the support for this change would be there.

A few example numbers here with respect to changes in both voting power and curation rewards depending on hypothetical Steem Power levels would serve as a good reference point.

Please test the changes to make sure there aren't any unforeseeable consequences.

Neutral on the optional more impact per vote feature. Any particular reason for this?

Sort:  

It lets people who are more time limited use up there voting power more efficiently and also allows a lot more nuance with the voting slider. Those who want to retain the old per vote levels can just set their slider lower.

ya I suppose if it's linear it'll be pretty difficult to abuse in any way
no reason not to support more control over how you use your voting power

pretty happy with these changes overall, steem is still small enough that we can make these big changes, and this curve is definitely a change for the better

I agree on the more impact per vote. I don't always have the time that I used to have and would love to use all of my voting power voting for 5 or 10 posts a day instead of have it sitting there unused.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.28
TRX 0.11
JST 0.031
BTC 68652.07
ETH 3861.77
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.70