RE: Conflicts of Interest in Science
"If you are seeking permission to copy, reproduce, or republish content from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and you are not the author of the content, you may use the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink® service. Simply visit NEJM.org and locate the article or video from which you seek to reuse content.
Once you have located and accessed the article you are looking for on NEJM.org:
Click on the Permissions link © in the toolbar to the left of the article. The RightsLink window will pop up with information about the content you have selected. Follow the prompts to select the options that best suit your needs. The system will either provide you with an immediate price quote or direct your request to the NEJM Permissions Department for further processing through the RightsLink interface. When prompted to continue, either sign in to your existing RightsLink account, or create a new account if you do not already have one, and follow the additional prompts to secure permission.
Confirmation of your permission and related terms and conditions will be sent to you instantly via email for most requests. Some requests may require Publisher review."
NEJM is not open access, and articles published there are not reproducible under creative commons licenses.
Thanks for the heads up.
No problem! There is a reason why I always discuss articles from open access publications. Its because I like to discuss the actual data and reproduce figures. I could write about stuff from science and nature, or NEJM like you did here, but its more difficult to truly do the information justice with out including data.
In your case, you could discuss the material if properly cited, you just cant reproduce the tables directly.
Yeah sorry, this is a case of monkey see monkey do, I was hesitant to use any tables or data from studies until I had seen it done by others elsewhere on steemstem, didn't realize these were so different. I guess that's just another reason why open access science is awesome!
Don't worry, we've all got each others backs. Also nothing to be sorry about, its a real struggle figuring out how to effectively blog here, all the while not setting your self up for any sort of weird legal trouble down the line. Each publication should have a page dedicated to reproduction, most will directly state whether the publications are available under some sort of creative commons license. Even then sometimes you have to be careful depending on the wording of the license, but most are pretty general free use with attribution.
Hopefully this is nice and copyright infringementless now, thanks for saving me the headache of being a proud owner of a cease and desist letter from New England! xD
I think it looks good now.
Phew!
Yeah it really is a different beast because of the whole votes=moneyish stuff thing here, I'll def have to keep an eye out for licenses and use terminology from publications in the future.