A question.

I write posts on advanced subjects (Astrophysics, particle physics, cosmology) which I try to make accessible to all, even non scientists, while still going in quite some detail. This is why I do it in series, so I can progressively guide the reader in the depths of things.

Many of my readers are regular ones, but I do think also of the new comers that discover my words for the first time. These need a little summary of the basics of the subject to enjoy the content of the post.

One solution is to give links to my previous work, sometimes to a section where there is a summary of basics. Yet, a new reader will probably not want to click on the link, search for the relevant paragraph, read it, come back, start reading the post, realising they need to review the basics again, go back to the summary, come back again etc... In our days of instantaneity, this is not very practical.

So I started adding an appendix to the articles with just what they need to know on the subject to fully enjoy the post.

The thing is that what they need to know is often common to many posts. And rewriting that appendix with different wording for each post just to avoid Cheetah is a real pain.

My latest post, I really didn't feel like rewriting the appendix so I just copy pasted the content needed as a quote like this:

that's how a quote looks like

I never received a Cheetah notice, so am not complaining. Yet, I suspect that doing this on a regular basis could bring the attention of the bot.

In that persepctive, I feel entirely justified to quote large sections of some of my previous posts as long they serve the role of appendix. Do you have a solution to avoid Cheetah taking it as plagiarism when doing so?