I enjoyed your article.
I'm curious if you found anything about regional effects. For example, in Japan it is considered healthy to eat raw eggs. Raw egg consumption is almost uniform in the population, for example, I used to eat breakfast at at fast food restaurant in Japan that served a raw egg with almost every meal. At this rate of consumption, a 1:20,000 ratio for contamination doesn't seem reasonable.
If someone consumes a raw egg with samonella, what is the probability of infection? If this had a reasonably low probability, say, 1%, this would bring the number of infections to 1 per 2,000,000 consumed eggs. This is almost reasonable, but we'd still anticipate about 6 infections per day in Tokyo.
The ratio of the rate of contamination of eggs (Salmonella-related) was estimated to be less than 1;23,000 ratio which is quite close to 1:20,000. The figure was actually a rough estimation and in Japan, food poisoning cases caused by Salmonella are greatly reduced due to the chicken vaccination program established by the local farmers. As you can see from the text I have quoted above, the prevalence of the disease has significantly dropped from 0.03% to 0.003% (1: 30,000) and then 0.0029% but the survey carried out by MAFF has revealed a completely different result (around 0.004%) thus I think the ratio of 1:20,000 eggs contamination is pretty reasonable.
I'm honestly not sure. For a disease to be caused, 100,000 salmonella species need to successfully invade the mucous epithelium. It will depend on the host immune system. That's why infants and elderly people are prone to get this kind of infection due to either immature or reduced immune function