Q: Are stellarators alternatives to tokamaks?

in #stemq6 years ago (edited)

magnconf.jpg

Credit

Above you can see the glowing plasma of a tokamak machine which has become iconic through popularization of fusion by various science fiction movies, series and books that employ fusion tokamaks as a source of energy on spaceships and other future devices.

At the same time tokamaks like ITER have become also iconic as ITER has become the slowest enginnering project humanity has ever undertaken, being under various stages of design and construction from the early eighties of the previous century.

Humanity needs fusion energy as soon as possible to shake its dependece of the fossil fuels. But the size and complexity of magnetic confinement tokamaks make them a very long term investments. At the same time inertial confinement fusion energy has never really gotten of the ground.

But a relatively new magnetic confinement machine called a stellarator has recently gained some traction. Are stellarators alternatives to tokamaks?

stemq-concept2.png

StemQ Notice: This post was originally submitted on StemQ.io, a Q&A application for STEM subjects powered by the Steem blockchain.

Sort:  

Hi @maticpecovnik!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 2.867 which ranks you at #11645 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has improved 597 places in the last three days (old rank 12242).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 276 contributions, your post is ranked at #257.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • Only a few people are following you, try to convince more people with good work.
  • You have already convinced some users to vote for your post, keep trying!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.29
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 69788.22
ETH 3727.34
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.75