Oh well, I guess bullshit like this shows up everywhere. For example, during the last significant Israeli defensive actions in Gaza in 2014 a proper assessment of casualties looking at their ages and genders, shows just how unbelievably targeted and careful Israeli military action is.

Analysis Of Gazan Casualties In Operation Protective Edge: As Of August 6th

The conclusions of that post (which were backed up months later by a number of academic studies and even the UN Battle Damage Reports):

Once again, the analysis indicates how even those numbers provided by the Gaza Health Ministry – which are clearly problematic and biased against Israel – do not support claims that Israel is targeting civilians or indiscriminately killing them, and do support IDF claims that we tried to pinpoint the terrorists.

The highest demographic category of those killed is young males of fighting age (18-28) – 28% (73% x 38%)
Over 37% of those killed have been males of age 18-38 (i.e including others who could very well be combatants)
When compared to the overall population of Gaza, a disproportionately high percentage of young to middle age males have been killed
Despite comprising approximately 50% of the population, the percentage of women killed is 20%.
Despite comprising approximately 50% of the population, the percentage of children under 14 killed is approximately 14%.
From a statistical point of view, our reader notes there is less than a 1% chance of the IDF killing people at random.

This result is unprecedented in modern warfare, considering Hamas’ use of civilians as human shields.