In my opinion I feel Hunter Biden being paid 50k a month by a Ukrainian gas company seems bad it just goes on to say when you're influential or you're at the topmost level of business or politics it's sometimes automatically possible to earn More money or own more. Hunter Biden might be corrupt. Yes! But earning that 50k isn't what will majet him corrupt.
You are right, it wasn't the salary paid or who got him the job, it's the other money that made it's way out of Ukraine to Latvia to Cyprus then into the United States where it landed into the account of Rosemont a equity firm part owned by Hunter Biden.
Did you hear Hunter Biden say on ABC that he says he was hired onto the board of the Ukrainian gas company because he spent 5 years as an Amtrak board member? Seriously?? Right, you working on the board of a U.S. government subsidized railroad automatically means you have the credentials to work for a natural gas company in a foreign nation.
How foolish does Hunter Biden, or anyone think that the US public is? They don’t believe that hogwash.
What is even better is him saying he is leaving the position so it doesn’t look bad when his dad gets elected to a position. So, it would look bad then, but did not look bad for the past FIVE YEARS??
....coincidentally he left the job at Amtrak right after his father got elected and formed an investment firm with John Kerry's stepson and this guy Devon Archer, an investment firm that was a recipient of money flowing out of Ukraine and China. Nothing to see here folks!....yeah, sure.
You are missing what the "acute" issue is here, sonny boy. It's not even actually that Hunter Biden just "happened" to get a connected job by way of his father being vice president. Like you said it's systemic cronyism. The "acute" issue here is that the UK leveled money laundering issues with Burisma and asked for documents. When they failed to obtain those documents after the investigation was put on hold because Joe Bidens son got hired on the board the UK froze the assets the company had in the UK. Instead of giving up the documents or the Ukrainian government reopening the investigation, the company sue in the UK for release of the funds frozen and won based on the fact the UK couldn't support their position as they didn't have any documents to further their case. That angered the UK who put pressure on the Ukrainian government and ambassadors/officials in the US to put the needed pressure on them. That's when the case got reopened and that's when Joe Biden went there and intervened to get the prosecutor fired after he learned from an article in the New York Times that his son was going to be brought in for questioning concerning money laundering issues with Burisma. Now no one at that time was bringing worth any charges or allegations of wrong doing on Hunter Bidens part and considering the UK asked for the documents prior to Hunter being hired it would seem that if the corruption or money laundering was still going on then Hunter would have something to be worried about, if not then he could have just stepped forward and cleared up the mess for the UK. Since that didn't happen and instead his dad intervened then it's questionable as to if Hunter became involved in laundering money also...which coincidentally, or ironically, there is actually a paper trail showing money channeled from Ukraine to Latvia to Cyprus and into the United States where it lands into the account of Rosemont, a equity firm whom Hunter Biden is a partner in. That is the "acute" question here as in most cases of cronyism money laundering isn't a requisite it's an illegality that the majority wouldn't entertain the thought as a condition of employment nor any reasonable person would seek to be hired in a company under investigation to begin with, especially those with a reputation to uphold.
In my opinion I feel Hunter Biden being paid 50k a month by a Ukrainian gas company seems bad it just goes on to say when you're influential or you're at the topmost level of business or politics it's sometimes automatically possible to earn More money or own more. Hunter Biden might be corrupt. Yes! But earning that 50k isn't what will majet him corrupt.
You are right, it wasn't the salary paid or who got him the job, it's the other money that made it's way out of Ukraine to Latvia to Cyprus then into the United States where it landed into the account of Rosemont a equity firm part owned by Hunter Biden.
Did you hear Hunter Biden say on ABC that he says he was hired onto the board of the Ukrainian gas company because he spent 5 years as an Amtrak board member? Seriously?? Right, you working on the board of a U.S. government subsidized railroad automatically means you have the credentials to work for a natural gas company in a foreign nation.
How foolish does Hunter Biden, or anyone think that the US public is? They don’t believe that hogwash.
What is even better is him saying he is leaving the position so it doesn’t look bad when his dad gets elected to a position. So, it would look bad then, but did not look bad for the past FIVE YEARS??
And now, back to your regular Steemit feed…
....coincidentally he left the job at Amtrak right after his father got elected and formed an investment firm with John Kerry's stepson and this guy Devon Archer, an investment firm that was a recipient of money flowing out of Ukraine and China. Nothing to see here folks!....yeah, sure.
Maybe, the truth will be revealed over time.
Let's hope!
@steemflagrewards @katharsisdrill for self upvote abuse
@sunlit7 - Add a downvote, no matter what percentage and add the line, "comment self-vote violation" and the @steemflagrewards call.
Do this in all comments. Then the bot will pick it up. More info here: https://discord.gg/bSA5yd
You are missing what the "acute" issue is here, sonny boy. It's not even actually that Hunter Biden just "happened" to get a connected job by way of his father being vice president. Like you said it's systemic cronyism. The "acute" issue here is that the UK leveled money laundering issues with Burisma and asked for documents. When they failed to obtain those documents after the investigation was put on hold because Joe Bidens son got hired on the board the UK froze the assets the company had in the UK. Instead of giving up the documents or the Ukrainian government reopening the investigation, the company sue in the UK for release of the funds frozen and won based on the fact the UK couldn't support their position as they didn't have any documents to further their case. That angered the UK who put pressure on the Ukrainian government and ambassadors/officials in the US to put the needed pressure on them. That's when the case got reopened and that's when Joe Biden went there and intervened to get the prosecutor fired after he learned from an article in the New York Times that his son was going to be brought in for questioning concerning money laundering issues with Burisma. Now no one at that time was bringing worth any charges or allegations of wrong doing on Hunter Bidens part and considering the UK asked for the documents prior to Hunter being hired it would seem that if the corruption or money laundering was still going on then Hunter would have something to be worried about, if not then he could have just stepped forward and cleared up the mess for the UK. Since that didn't happen and instead his dad intervened then it's questionable as to if Hunter became involved in laundering money also...which coincidentally, or ironically, there is actually a paper trail showing money channeled from Ukraine to Latvia to Cyprus and into the United States where it lands into the account of Rosemont, a equity firm whom Hunter Biden is a partner in. That is the "acute" question here as in most cases of cronyism money laundering isn't a requisite it's an illegality that the majority wouldn't entertain the thought as a condition of employment nor any reasonable person would seek to be hired in a company under investigation to begin with, especially those with a reputation to uphold.