I think it is useful to consider that the Hegelian Dialectic advances controlled opposition, and absent careful observation of apparently independent media, it can be very successful at damning with faint praise and downplaying organic action that effectively opposes incipient totalitarianism, and even interjecting false, contrived propaganda as novel information. Zionazi organizations particularly are eminently competent at astroturfing and gaslighting, as is revealed by their creation and demonization of Hamas to focus Palestinian resistance to Zionist terrorism and violence in that controlled opposition by people unable to parse that sophisticated deception.

It is telling that where nominally globalist polities, such as the EU, are infiltrating Muslim agents provocateurs, strongly pro-Zionist - and thus organizations supporting globalists - as well as neonazi, opposition agents are presented by media as the only anti-globalist forces. These are long cons, and coordinate support from LEOs and government penal institutions to create street cred for disinformation agents. Actual organic opposition organizations are infiltrated at the same time with 'woke' forces that destabilize and dissipate them, exactly as successfully broke OWS, and the Belgian protests of government corruption apparent in the DuTroux child sex trafficking case, successfully constraining actual disruption of effective use of force by promoting adopting white (another color revolution, although in reverse in that specific case) and utter pacifism when torches and pitchforks were called for to actually resolve the corruption in government.

These tactics can be understood and countered by tracking financial support for such controlled ops, and linking interlocking missions with known controlled ops. Knowing that controlled opposition will be infiltrated, and exactly what the need of the Hegelian Dialectic is in that tactical undertaking, can be used to predict what operations will be undertaken by organizations so infiltrated, enabling them to be identified early. For example, EU political programs causing massive immigration from Middle Eastern nations strongly impacted by Western military destabilization will be actually supported by pro-Zionist controlled opposition, and that such controlled opposition will be vilified in the enemedia, which will cast it as the enemy of the enemies of diversity and multiculturalism. Destabilization of organic dissent will be effected by ignoring them, and insertion of controlled opposition, such as the identity politics forces that dissipated the OWS movement.

It is obvious that Zionazis are the globalists (Zionists are the source of the vast majority of pro-diversity propaganda in the EU), and the demonization of controlled opposition in the enemedia - including covertly controlled alternative media sources - diverts organic support from potentially disruptive organizations to those that are controlled by globalists pushing diversity. In hindsight it is clear how Trump was presented as the candidate hated by globalist enemedia outlets, and a large enough cohort of anti-globalist populations was seduced into supporting Trump, now clearly shown to be an agent forwarding globalist agendae, as a way to oppose globalism. One way to discover potentially organic dissent to simply to note those ignored by the enemedia. The Yellow Jacket movement is practically invisible today, despite involving a broad cross-section of the French and continuing operations for most of a year. The enemedia casting violent protestors as innocent victims of brutal oppression is an example of casting controlled opposition as organic 'the will of the people' dissent, as you here point out, while utterly ignoring the Yellow Jackets and voices like @clarityofsignal indicates organic dissent that potentiate actual opposition and effective political actions to oppose totalitarian oppression.

Organizations expert in conducting psyops, like Black Cube, source of many GEOTUS memes still being effectively used to divert people away from organic anti-globalist and Zionazi organizations, are prosecuting these tactics successfully.

As you have ascertained by comparing the tactics of agents provocateurs in Hong Kong with textbook CIA training, that same technique is applicable to other groups, and linking techniqes, groups, and funding via a database could be very useful to more quickly ascertain controlled opposition and Hegelian Dialectic operations elsewhere, such as Brexit, Xinjiang, and Nicaragua.

I very much appreciate your insightful use of such analysis to demonstrate how that can separate wheat - organic dissent - from chaff, the controlled opposition that sucks support away from actual organic movements and that is used to covertly support globalist and Zionazi agendae. Professional propagandists are extremely sophisticated, and in order to effectively oppose them, we need to be as well.

Thanks!