UK Warning!!!

https://www.overclock3d.net/news/misc_hardware/uk_government_responds_to

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/318091/sponsors/new?token=TsxHbhnI0LCL5dsl3aE-

The author has become even more unnerved by the latest research he has conducted and found that, not only can the Government legally vaccinate you without consent but also the author sent this advice and caution:

http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/assembly-business/legislation/2011-2016-mandate/pri

THIS IS THE SCARIEST PART: READ CAREFULLY!!!

Medical certificates of cause of death

4(1) Sub-paragraphs (2) to (5) have effect for any period before the coming into force of the section 22 of the 1953 Act that is substituted by paragraph 14 of Schedule 21 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.

(2) A registered medical practitioner (“X”) who is NOT THE PRACTITIONER who attended the deceased person (“D”) during D’s last illness MAY SIGN A CERTIFICATE under section 22(1) of the 1953 Act (certificates of cause of death) if—

the practitioner who attended D is unable to sign the certificate or it is impractical for that practitioner to sign the certificate, and

X is able to state to the BEST of X’s knowledge and BELIEF of the cause of death.

(3) A registered medical practitioner (“P”) may sign a certificate under section 22(1) of the 1953 Act, even in the case of a person who has NOT BEEN ATTENDED during that person’s LAST ILLNESS by a REGISTERED MEDICAL PRACTITIONER, if P is able to state to the BEST of P’s knowledge and BELIEF of the cause of death. The death rate of COVID-19 is completely fabricated, and it is now Law in the Coronavirus Act 2020. please help me revoke this Act.

(4)Where a registered medical practitioner proposes to sign a certificate under section 22(1) of the 1953 Act in reliance on sub-paragraph (2) or (3)—

(a)Forms 14 and 15 in Schedule 2 to the principal 1987 Regulations have effect as if in each case—

(i) the line beginning with “Last seen” were omitted, and
(ii) the words “I was in medical attendance during the above named deceased’s LAST ILLNESS, and that” were omitted;

(b)Forms 11 and 12 in Schedule 2 to the Registration of Births and Deaths (Welsh Language) Regulations 1987 (S.I. 1987/2089) were subject to modifications corresponding to those mentioned in paragraph (a).

The unnecessary lockdown - More evidence

The author also performed another calculation and he found what the doctors in California found, in that:

UK Deaths = 21,678

Population of UK = 67,010,000 approx.

21,678 / 67,010,000 *100 = 0.03% of the population has died from "COVID-19".

This illustrates that the lockdown was completely unnecessary as this is 2 whole factors lower than 2019 flu season i.e. 0.1%. So, why is everyone still acquiescing to the few dominating the many? Use your intuition and realise there is something wrong about all this!!! Unfortunately, the author is still not getting any support for the revocation of this Act.

The author feels that:

Hysteria and Illness

Along this journey the author not only started seeing the latent effects of Mass Pathogenic Illness (i.e. the author was asked to leave a shop as he had a smokers cough that was mis-identified as the author having COVID-19) that had been drummed up by the media and the Government. As the author is a trained clinical psychologist and avid researcher, the author then offered these propositions on LinkedIn:

How many reports of COVID-19 could be put down to Seasonal Flu and or Common Cold and being mistaken and wrongly diagnosed as COVID-19?

The reasoning being: Are all colds and flu's being determined as COVID-19?

Hence are people confirming their biases, whereto for, this has become - in psychological terms - a mass pathogenic illness. People may think that because they get the sniffles, they are infected with COVID-19, but they all fail to check whether they have been to an infected country in the last two weeks or frequented with people that are infected. Mass pathogenic illness (MPI): also called mass SOCIOGENIC illness, mass psychogenic disorder, EPIDEMIC hysteria, or MASS hysteria, is "the rapid spread of illness SIGNS (not actual infection) and SYMPTOMS affecting members of a COHESIVE group (like the LEFT), originating from a NERVOUS SYSTEM disturbance involving excitation, loss, or alteration of function, whereby PHYSICAL COMPLAINTS that are exhibited UNCONSCIOUSLY have NO - repeat NO -corresponding ORGANIC aetiology. MPI involves the spread of illness symptoms through a population where there is NO VIRAL or BACTERIAL agent responsible for contagion. MPI is distinct from other types of collective delusions by involving physical symptoms. Adrenaline is a typical response factor to emotional stress; unfortunately, it tightens the capillaries thus degrades one's health. Little certainty exists regarding its aetiology. So, the authors conclusion is that: the COVID-19 virus would have been no more impactful than a Seasonal Flu if this had been played out - without the hysteria. The author says this as last year 646,000 died from Flu and Flu-like symptoms.

Qualities of MPI outbreaks often include:

• symptoms that have no plausible organic basis;
• symptoms that are transient and benign;
• symptoms with rapid onset and recovery;
• occurrence in a segregated group; the presence of extraordinary anxiety;
• symptoms that are spread via sight, sound or oral communication (e.g. Facebook, Twitter, Snap-Chat, Tik-Tok, etc;
• a spread that moves down the age scale, beginning with older i.e. at-risk groups or higher-status people (Celebrities and Government officials e.g. B. Johnson);
• a preponderance of female participants.

British psychiatrist Simon Wesseley distinguishes between two forms of MPI: Mass anxiety hysteria "consists of episodes of acute anxiety, occurring mainly in schoolchildren. Prior tension is absent, and the rapid spread is by visual contact." Mass motor hysteria "consists of abnormalities in motor behaviour. It occurs in any age group and prior tension is present. Initial cases can be identified, and the spread is gradual. . . [T]he Outbreak may be prolonged." (as we have already heard in the media frenzy of mis-informed non-sense i.e. 2nd and 3rd wave) While his definition is sometimes adhered to, others such as Ali-Gombe et al. of the University of Maiduguri, Nigeria contest Wesseley's definition and describe outbreaks with qualities of both mass motor hysteria and mass anxiety hysteria. The DSM-IV-TR does not have specific diagnosis for this condition but the text describing conversion disorder states that "In 'epidemic hysteria', shared symptoms develop in a circumscribed group of people following 'exposure' to a common precipitant." Therefore, if the virus will naturally die off toward Summer (just like all flu’s over the Winter period) then what is the panic? Just a load of reactionary and alarmist that do not care to fact check the real issues and concerns. Which are the same every year around this seasonal period. Calm down everyone and just take the necessary precautions if you are in a high-risk group or you live with someone that is on a high-risk group.

https://www.britishmarine.co.uk/News/2017/August/The-RCD-officially-enters-into-UK-law

How have the Government maintained this facade:

Does all this "grassing on your neighbours" remind anyone of the Nazi Youth i.e. The Hitler Youth was a way to get Hitler’s ideology into the family unit, and some members of the Hitler Youth even denounced their parents when they behaved in ways not approved of by the Reich. Additionally, "Report on Your Neighbour" (Nazi regime slogan). Ordinary German citizen being frightened about saying anything critical about the Nazi government in front of their children or at work or at school. The Nazis encouraged children especially, to report anything "suspicious" that they might hear their teachers or parents say and report it to their Nazi youth leader or directly to the Gestapo. The 'Report your neighbour' theme was used by American film makers at the time to illustrate the difference in the climate of freedom found in American versus the heavy hand of fascist repression found in Nazi Germany. Now you tell me if this is not feeling familiar?? As to date however, no-one has responded to any of the post the author has submitted. This tells him that not only is the current phenomenon that is the media created panic over a seasonal flu a pilot study for more authoritarian measures, but also that the authoritarian regime has already prohibited anyone from commenting to data and facts the author has posted. A very interesting quandary indeed. Especially when you (as the reader) consider that this has only taken 36 days to implement. The main reason is that the Government can pass Laws and Legislation by fiat, which means there is no direct opposition to the Laws, Bills and/or legislation they feel like imposing. The author really fears for the future of liberty, freedom of speech and autonomy if this is only the start of the jackboot being placed on our collective necks.

https://thewire.in/the-sciences/the-stanford-prison-experiment-or-how-to-make-it-

As the author carried on his research, he spied an interesting set of comparatives arose whilst the author was mulling over some ideas, namely this: The COVID-19 Experiment: The lockdown and Police overreach. These precepts, as the author noticed, had a significant resemblance to Zimbardo and Milgram. What the author is suggesting is that the COVID-19 pandemic is turning into – what seems to be – a mirror of the Stanford Prison Experiment performed by Zimbardo. In this experiment Zimbardo sampled more than 70 young men that responded to an advertisement about a “psychological study of prison life,” and experimenters selected 24 applicants who were judged to be physically and mentally healthy. The paid subjects—they received $15 a day—were divided randomly into equal numbers of guards and prisoners. Guards were ordered not to physically abuse prisoners and were issued mirrored sunglasses that prevented any eye contact. Prisoners were “arrested” by actual police and handed over to the experimenters in a mock prison in the basement of a campus building. Prisoners were then subjected to indignities that were intended to simulate the environment of a real-life prison. In keeping with Zimbardo’s intention to create very quickly an “atmosphere of oppression,” each prisoner was made to wear a “dress” (In this case we are told to wear masks, gloves and distance ourselves from others) as a uniform and to carry a chain padlocked around one ankle.

https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/the_banality_of_heroism

All participants were observed and videotaped by the experimenters (or in the case of the COVID-19 experiment we are observed by drones, PCSO’s, the Police and our neighbours). It was intended to measure the effect of role-playing, labelling, and social expectations on behaviour over a period of two weeks. However, mistreatment of prisoners escalated so alarmingly (check out this video for reference to Police being like prison guards in the COVID-19 experiment:

) that the experiment was terminated after only six days for fear that one of the prisoners would be seriously hurt. Several of the guards became progressively more sadistic - particularly at night when they thought the cameras were off, despite being picked by chance out of the same pool as the prisoners. The experiment very quickly got out of hand. A riot broke out on day two. One prisoner developed a psychosomatic rash all over his body upon finding out that his "parole" had been turned down (Now think of the possibility of nomocosial infections from being told that we may be lockdown until August/September).

http://www.online-psychology-degrees.org/10-bizarre-psychology-experiments/

Although the intent of the experiment was to examine captivity, its result has been used to demonstrate the impressionability and obedience of people when provided with a legitimizing ideology and social and institutional support (Are you starting to see the resemblance yet? Please watch these for context -

). It is also used to illustrate cognitive dissonance theory and the power of seniority/authority. Even Zimbardo himself found that his behaviour changed when he took on the role of prison superintendent. Once he identified with his role, he found that he had trouble recognizing the abuses happening in his own prison: “I lost my sense of compassion,”. The prisoners soon adopted prisoner-like behaviour too (Not unlike what the UK population has done). They started taking the prison rules very seriously (Once again, not unlike how the UK population have taken legislation – that is not law – as law and have conformed and are obedient to, what are tantamount to, guidelines), as though they were there for the prisoners’ benefit and infringement would spell disaster for all of them (Sounding familiar yet?!).

https://www.simplypsychology.org/zimbardo.html

Some even began siding with the guards against prisoners who did not obey the rules (Report you Neighbour – are you seeing it yet?). The prisoners were taunted with insults and petty orders (e.g. In the COVID-19 case, £30 fines for unessential travel), they were given pointless and boring tasks to accomplish (e.g. the campaign to find things to do at home during the lockdown), and they were generally dehumanized. It’s been pointed out that the Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrates the importance of reviewing the ethics of each research project before the study goes forward, and for researchers to think carefully about the study methods that they use. However, despite the controversies, the Stanford Prison Experiment raises a fascinating question: how much does the social context influence Police behaviour?

The Zimbardo comparison to the evident COVID-19 experiment I have also seen another comparative between Stanley Milgram’s study into obedience i.e. How Far Will You Go to Obey an Order? and how the Police are not only enacting legislative guidelines as law but are also actively enforcing these guidelines with terminal intensity. What I have noticed is: In Milgram’s study on the concepts of obedience and authority it involved instructing study participants to deliver increasingly high-voltage shocks to an actor in another room, who would scream and eventually go silent as the shocks became stronger. The shocks were not real, but study participants were made to believe that they were. Milgram (1963) examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II, Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defence often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from their superiors. The experiments began in July 1961, a year after the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised the experiment to answer the question:

“Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?"

https://allthatsinteresting.com/milgram-experiment/3

The procedure was that the participant was paired with another person and they drew lots to find out who would be the ‘learner’ and who would be the ‘teacher.’ The draw was fixed so that the participant was always the teacher, and the learner was one of Milgram’s confederates (pretending to be a real participant). The learner (a confederate called Mr. Wallace) was taken into a room and had electrodes attached to his arms, and the teacher and researcher went into a room next door that contained an electric shock generator and a row of switches marked from 15 volts (Slight Shock) to 375 volts (Danger: Severe Shock) to 450 volts (XXX).

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/milgram-poland-experiment-recreated-auth

People tend to obey orders from other people if they recognize their authority as morally right and/or legally based (Like the Police). This response to legitimate authority is learned in a variety of situations (e.g. this is your commanding officer), for example in the family, school, and workplace.

Today, the Milgram experiment is widely criticized on both ethical and scientific grounds. The reason for the ethical grounds is because – as Milgram found - that the participants went to at least 300 volts and 65% continued until the full 450 volts i.e. this voltage would kill you and this does not exclude women from this propensity to obey an authority figure. He concluded that under the right circumstances ordinary people e.g. like the Police will obey unjust orders. Therefore, ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figure, even to the extent of killing an innocent human being. To this day, Milgram's conclusions about humanity's willingness to obey authority figures remain influential and well-known.

http://psychology-4-everyone.blogspot.com/2012/03/milgrams-shocking-experiments-

The most disturbing thought the author had was when he was reminded of a scene in the King Arthur movie ‘Legend of the sword’ were the character played by Jude Law (Vortigern) professes in a long exposition about how it feels to have total power over people:

http://collider.com/king-arthur-lionel-wigram-interview/

“I will show them power, I will show them strength and dignity, you will show them lies, weakness and shame. They may have come for you, but they will leave with a lasting impression of me. They may even hate me, I’ll let them hate! Just as long as they fear. When people fear you - I mean really fear you – it is the most intoxicating sensation a man can possess. A force of something almost indescribable moves through your blood and takes you over completely.”

And when the author also recalled that ‘absolute power corrupts absolutely’ he became noticeable disturb by the realisation of how this feeling of power over the UK residence may become something that is difficult to let go of.

https://inews.co.uk/essentials/news/police-mental-health-centre-overrun-applica

Now, if you think of the Police obeying their commanding officers and they are saying things like the Northampton Police Chief Constable announced in an address to the press (

) were he affirmed that: if people were unwilling to follow the guidelines he would have the shopping centre martialled and your shopping bags searched for non-essential items and combine this with the idea of the Zimbardo Experiment you start to see how we are being subjected to a prolonged and sustained barrage of overreach and abuse of power from the top down. Now think if he is being this adamant about things like having luxury items because you need a bit of couch comfort while you watch a film during an evening in the lockdown. What does it suggest? Well, it suggests that Police officers (as seen in previous posts) will be obedient to his rule and enforce the guidelines as if they were Law. Especially when we have so many different nationalities represented in the UK police force. And when reviewing the cross-cultural studies were Milgram’s study on obedience was replicated in different settings e.g. an office block and what was found was interesting.

http://www.datpiff.com/AK-The-Agentic-State-mixtape.786113.html

What is unsurprising is that the Police are in the agentic state where they are allow their commanding officers to direct their actions and then pass off the responsibility for the consequences to the person giving the orders i.e. Government. In other words, they act as agents for another person’s will. This in turn infringes, not only on our liberties, the Bill of Rights and our Human rights it also impedes upon our autonomous state where the public direct their own actions, and they take responsibility for the results of those actions. Milgram suggested that two things must be in place for a person to enter the agentic state:

1. The person giving the orders is perceived as being qualified to direct other people’s behaviour i.e. Government. That is, they are legitimate.
2. The person being ordered about i.e. the Police can believe that the authority i.e. Government will accept responsibility for what happens.

https://hypnohousemusic.blogspot.com/2017/09/label-hypnohouse-trax-artist-agentic.html

Agency theory says that people will obey an authority when they believe that the authority will take responsibility for the consequences of their actions. This is supported by some aspects of Milgram’s evidence. For example, when participants were reminded that they had responsibility for their own actions, almost none of them were prepared to obey. In contrast, many participants who were refusing to go on did so if the experimenter said that he would take responsibility. Moreover, the Police are 65% - 92% assured to be obedient and make sure we are obedient. And do remember that the Agentic State is also extended to our behaviour towards the Police and our obedience to authority figures, but this is another example of the illusion of power. What do you think? Is there a comparative to be drawn with Milgram’s study and Zimbardo’s Prison experiment, the author would say so!

https://www.overclock3d.net/news/misc_hardware/uk_government_responds_to

I am starting a petition and I would really appreciate you support in signing the petition and sharing all links to everyone you know. This is a troubling time and even more so when we see people being unfairly treated and/or fined for taking a stroll in the park or going for a walk with their pet.

I’ve made a petition – will you sign it?

My petition:

Revoke the Coronavirus Act 2020

To be held accountable for the breach of Human Rights and the Bill of Rights violations against the UK population i.e. breach of the freedom from inhuman treatment during COVID-19
As UK citizens have not been free from Government interference and have not only failed to protect the right to freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment, but also the Government has failed to the duty to uphold and/or take positive action to protect the freedom and rights set out in the Bill of Rights and the Human Rights Act. As this infringement constitutes a breach of these rights and freedoms the Government is liable for damages and UK citizens are entitled to compensation.

---

Click this link to sign the petition:

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/318091/sponsors/new?token=TsxHbhnI0LCL5dsl3aE-