[Hapramp] [0.0.7] Profile with no Name and About text shows N/A
Project Information
- Repository:
https://github.com/hapramp/Hapramp-Android - Project Name: Hapramp
- Publisher (if applicable): @aviaryan
Expected Behavior
Profile with no Full Name and About text should not show N/A
Actual Behavior
Profile with no full name set, shows N/A
Steps to Reproduce
- Login with a user with no Name and About text set. Ex (@fastandcurious)
- Go to Profile and check the name under profile picture and about section
- Device : Samsung S8
- System Operating : 8.0.0 Oreo
- App Version: 0.0.7
Thanks for contributing to Utopian!
This is not a bug.
Even though it was acknowledged and fixed in a commit, the fix as you can see is non code related. If anything, this is a copy-writing issue.
So now when accessing such profile, you will see nothing. This is not an improvement in user experience - it's a change that the P.O agreed with.
The expected and actual behaviors you described are actually factually wrong. Your expected "Profile with no Full Name and About text should not show N/A" contradicts the code as I showed above. If info is not available - as user hadn't filled it - N/A is perfectly reasonable text to show, thus this is not a bug. Thus changing from "N/A" to blank is not a big fox either.
Do note that some text changed can be considered a bug fix, but changing "N/A" to " " is not one of those cases. It's changing one representation of null with another. If it doesn't have any impact on the UX - than it's probably not a bug.
Keep in mind, this is a good contribution to the project - it's just isn't a bug, and it can't be rewarded in our category.
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
@achiron I asked PO if this a bug before posting and he agreed.
I don't know what copy write means here but i this was done in the code so i believe its code.
Same "code" as your comment. Would you argue your comment is a syntax in a programming language?
Copy writing is anything that has to do with the text applications and websites show to their users as part of the UI. Changing a word that means "No data" to an actual representation of no data, is not a change in the code we consider a valid contribution in the category. I can't speak for the P.O, if he wanted to give feedback - he should provided some context in the commit, or in the issue you submitted.
I'm sorry if you're disappointed, I can understand your frustration, but there is nothing I can do. It's just not a bug. It worked as expected - showing the exact text the code told it to, when there is no data to show. In other words, what you consider a bug, was there by design. Like I said, as he agreed with the proposed change, I can't deny this is a valid contribution to the project - but per our guidelines, it is not a bug.
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Before i reply, Below response is not so I get reviewed.
Reason for my disappointment is not this issue or this review but how the category is operating in general. I think i should be frank about it now:
Category has been modified to expect proposing a solution. In corporate world, no tester ever provides a bug fix. Thats the task of a developer. How many technologies do you think a person can code and debug in.
Even after an issue is accepted by a PO, there's a 50/50 chance that it will get considered by utopian because one of the 2 reasons
For example: If a PO has accepted an issue after it was posted to utopian, some mods consider it as not accepted by PO while other consider it as being accepted by PO if it was accepted before the review.
I hope to don't take it personally because I am not trying to single out any one person here, I am just providing insight on what I feel as a contributor.
CC: @sachincool, @fego, @tobias-g
Marking you guys CC so maybe it helps the category in some way.
Thank you for your review, @achiron!
So far this week you've reviewed 2 contributions. Keep up the good work!
Hi @mightypanda, I'm @checky ! While checking the mentions made in this post I noticed that @aviaryan doesn't exist on Steem. Did you mean to write @aaaryan ?
If you found this comment useful, consider upvoting it to help keep this bot running. You can see a list of all available commands by replying with
!help.