DISCRIMINATION OF UNVACCINATED KIDS' RIGHTS: IS IT LOGICAL AND LEGAL?
Pressure and threats aren't enough "punishment" for parents who have "awoken" and don't vaccinate their kids - that is what officials think creating new rules of limitation for unvaccinated children.
But are they necessary, logical and legal?
Let's find it our using the example with Russian kindergartens.
Here all unvaccinated kids are isolated for 60 days after vaccination from polio. They are either transfered to other groups of kids (that is stress for kids who are used to communicate with definite chilren and tutors), but it happens rarely, more often these kids are made not to visit kindergartens at all during 60 days!
It's not a big problem if a mother doesn't work, otherwise it becomes a great problem! A vaccation for 2 months? What boss will allow it? There is no reason to leave a working place for such a long period, otherwise, you can lose this job forever. KIndergartens are exactly the way to have control over kids while parents are absent - all parents think so.
So what to do? And in general should parents of unvaccinated kids do anything with this problem?
The main argument of all kindergarten tutors is that a kid can get infected from vaccinated kids, so he must be isolated.
The vaccine from polio is alive, so there's alive infection inside of this injection, and that is the main fear of many parents.
BUT. It's dead or alive but it's medicine! All vaccines are medcines, not diseases in injections (at least they are performed in such a way), so they must protect but not cause risks and dangers for anybody! Isn't it?
The words "to get infected" from alive vaccine is wrong in its root if we speak about injections of high quality, well made and tested in a proper way. Such vaccines should make a barrier against diseases but not to cause them for healthy kids!
So all parents of unvaccinated kids hearing words:
- "Please, isolate your kid because all the rest kids have been vaccinated with alive polio vaccine, so he can get infected"*,
must be brave enough to ask:
- "Sorry?? Get infected?? So you've just got infected those kids who were healthy and safe? INFECTED? not protected from this disease*?"
Moreover, absurd is just startling!
Just think: a mother of unvaccinated kid is asked to take him away from vaccinated ones! It looks like a light try to save unvaccinated kids who can have any contacts with vaccinated ones.
So this vaccine is dangerous so much, that all the rest should be isolated even from kids who have got it!! for 2 months! !
And what about vaccinated ones? Let's continue to inject them with all possible trash?
There're 3 factors when a vaccinated kid really can be dangerous:
an infected component of the vaccine wasn't weakened enough (a vaccine of low quality)
a kid has a state of low immunity protection
he has predisposition to this disease.
Only all these 3 factors together can create danger for kids around this vaccinated one.
All the rest cases are just intimidation and manipulation of parents. Their goal is total vaccination without exceptions.
And the last question: whether tutors in kindergartens really can insist on isolation of unvaccinated kids?
NO.
In this case rules of sanitary epidemiological inspection differ from the main law of the country (total absurd!!).
The law says that there can be no reasons which can prevent a person to get education.
But sanitary rules which are more important for kids organisations really have a rule of 60-days isolations.
But there is an essential detail!
It is said that unvaccinated and vaccinated kids should be separated. That's it!
No words about isolation and infringement of rights of unvaccinated kids only!!
Why do their parents only should seek for a way out for these long 60 days?
Why must only they have problems at their work?
SO parents of unvaccinated kids have ALL right to insist on their visiting of kindergartens, and if tutors are afraid od rules breaking, then they should seek for a way to solve this problem by themselves!
At long last vaccinated kids can stay at home instead of unvaccinated ones!
The decision of this widely spread problem is only in parental persistence.
We should only know our rights!
Sometimes it's enough for the victory.
To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.
Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.
Here in Ohio we have to fill out paperwork that says we object morally. Soon they are trying to take that away and only allow religious exemptions. My father is an ordained minister and has second thoughts about supporting the right to choose for his own children.
I personally think we will have more effect with the adjuvant issue. All of those toxins are no good. Just ask Rober F. Kennedy Jr., Jenny McCarthy, Dr. Paul Thomas, Tim Knopp, Dr. Jennifer Margulis, Professor Christopher Exley, or Mark Blaxill. Just to name a few.
My third child has only received the hepatitis B at 2 weeks under duress. He is the most intelligent and farthest advanced of all of my children.
Posted using Partiko Android
Thanks for using eSteem!
Your post has been voted as a part of eSteem encouragement program. Keep up the good work! Install Android, iOS Mobile app or Windows, Mac, Linux Surfer app, if you haven't already!
Learn more: https://esteem.app
Join our discord: https://discord.gg/8eHupPq
Fuck no, keep your little unvaccinated disease ball away from other children. If you don't want to vaccinate your children you don't get to decide to put others at risk because yours "deserves education"
ahaha, stop it.
There are some senseless processes in life, and arguing with a vaccination fan is one of them.
I won't reply.
Yea, I don't argue when I don't have any valid points or proof of what I say either.
You do not have the RIGHT to an education, it is a privilege.
waste of time.
pls leave my page. pay attention yo your own blog.
thanks.
No? You want to post your opinion and false information in a public domain expect to be criticized and challenged. Your'e entitled to your opinion but if you wanna post it somewhere like Steemit, especially to make money from it then you better be able to defend it with FACTS and not just emotion.
The fact you can post about it but not defend it shows your opinion isn't based in fact.
I pay attention to lots of things, being able to back up what I say on my blog is one of them. you should look into that.
Отличная статья. Знание законов значительно упрощает нам жизнь:)!!!
It's too bad most parents don't know shit. Putting all of the unvaccinated kids together would be extremely dangerous and increases your chances of a widespread outbreak and mutation. The thought that somebody could "get infected" from a live vaccine is hilarious, I am glad you broke it down. If your kid did somehow get infected by somebody carrying a vaccine that would most likely make your kid immune in the same way the vaccine would.
I couldn't more strongly agree with your point that infectious vectors for diseases, such as children vaccinated with live polio virus, should be quarantined, rather than those not infected.
However, as a parent, I noted that various other problems faced by my children were also only potentiated by allowing institutions to control my children and person. The problem you seem to find necessary to solve is that the institutions that take your children from you, in this example, kindergarten, put a burden on parents of caring for their own children.
So, refuse to institutionalize your children.
I homeschooled my children as a single parent while working construction, without ever once hiring a babysitter, nanny, or even letting my mother take care of them. I took them to work with me, and taught them how to do the things that people need to know. By the age of 10 my oldest had purchased his own vehicle with wages he earned working with me.
I am not telling you how to do things. I am but pointing out that the problem facing parents in Russia of their children being quarantined because vaccinated children are vectors for disease is only a problem because parents don't take responsibility to raise their own children, and that I have proved it can be done even as a single parent working full time, without any help or assistance from any institution, including government.
The fact is that trying to tweak a system of institutionalizing children cannot fix the problem that institutionalizing children causes in the first place. It is up to parents to raise their kids, not schools, hospitals, or government. It is institutions that are the problem, and those institutions cannot solve the problems that they create by their very existence.
You, and the free sovereign people of the world, can solve those problems by eschewing those institutions that cause them.
Thanks!