Vaccines Harm Bro

in #vaccines5 years ago (edited)

Imagine taking your brand new car to a mechanic bully?

While you wait.
Oh that's a break line ? Snip!
Oh your tires are balanced ? Not anymore.
Let me just pour a gallon of water in the gas tank. Trust me I'm a mechanic!
Drain half the oil and pour it on the windshield.
Screw up the timing.
Take off the radiator cap and pour some unwanted crap in there.
Toss the cap in the garbage.
Remove any filters.
Take out the seat belts! you don't need them because the car is safe!

Give you your car back and it's making loud noises , don't worry that's normal.

Good luck in the next 12 hours and if something happens to you or your car I'm not held liable and the car manufacturer accountable.

Brand new babies with the vaccine bullies!
While you wait.
Snip!
Early cord clamped!
Shit in your eyes.
Poisoned! Trust me I'm a doctor!
Injected with Synthetic crap!
Injected with Unwanted crap!
Imbalanced immune system!
Blood slugged!
Lymphatics clogged!
Neuroinflammation!
Microglia primed!

Give you your baby back screaming.
That's normal don't worry .

Good luck in the next 12 hours.
If something happens I'm not liable and my drug buddies the manufacturers not accountable.

Ok back to sleep !
That was my dream or should I say nightmare.

IMG_0477.PNG

Sort:  

Herd
A very noteworthy study was published in 2013, looking at baboons, which are susceptible and manifest whooping cough like humans do. In the study by Warfel, baboons who were either vaccinated or not vaccinated were later exposed to pertussis bacteria, something that cannot be done experimentally in humans (due to ethical considerations), but which yields very important data. Expectedly, the baboons that had never been infected got the cough and remained colonized with bacteria for a maximum of 38 days. Baboons that were previously vaccinated and immune vaccine-style, became colonized upon later exposure for a longer time than the naïve baboons; 42 days. However unvaccinated baboons that recovered naturally and were later exposed to the bacteria did not become colonized at all – zero days.

So, who is providing better herd immunity in the face of bacterial exposure? Vaccinated individuals who presume they are immune, yet remain asymptomatically colonized for 42 days spreading bacteria? Unvaccinated kids who get infected and remain colonized for 38 days? Or the naturally convalesced who are not able to be colonized and therefore do not spread bacteria at all upon re-exposure? Better still: natural convalescence makes for decades longer, solid immunity than vaccination.
http://www.pnas.org/content/111/2/787.abstract
IMG_7958.PNG

Rookie q: I dont understand why the baboons wouldn't have gained immunity if they had it when they infected(vaccinated) younger... is it because they were not fully developed? opposed to the naive baboons in the study? what is the factor in your opinion? is the factor inoculation versus contracting it airborne?

Abnorma entrance = Abnormal immune response.

:D fair enough, the truth is simple

Nice to see you're active, bro! The rabbit hole just gets deeper ^^ ...

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.29
TRX 0.13
JST 0.033
BTC 63133.02
ETH 3043.69
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.63