The Capitalism In Our Relationships

in #capitalism7 years ago






Ι grew up in a rural place. Most of my relationships were based on constant fights. I hold the belief that if there is no quarrel with someone else you cannot really know them. One simply cannot have the whole picture. Similarly, when we visit a store, many of us, always make sure to ask about the negative aspects of a product. We don't just trust a piece of clothing. We have specific expectations based on price, reputation and craftsmanship. When it comes apart, we are aware of the reasons (more or less) because we amassed enough info about while we were buying. Human relationships are compiled much the same way.

As I grow older I realise how important of a commodity quarrel is and how it builds solid boundaries for relationships. Social interactions are not all that different from material ones. We are all products of previous experiences and we carry with us positive and negative aspects depending who we are dealing with in time and space. We need the entire picture and as much information as possible if we are to make educated decisions for our future.

Relationships are tradeable much like everything else. Many seem to detest the idea and rather hold the belief that they are different than materialistic ones. Perhaps the lack or romance is what bothers most people since it makes the world a really cruel and unfair place. Nonetheless, people forget that they often talk the way they talk so they can be likeable and approachable. Even our most altruistic acts aim for selfish gains. We are all moving, breathing advertisements. Everybody is selling something at any given point and someone is bound to fail for someone else to succeed.





This realisation should make everyone reconsider the nature of human relationships. For one it should make us all realise that all relationships operate in their own universe, each with specific rules. For everyone else, our personal relationships are more or less elusive. Have you even watched a board meeting of a company? Everyone has brought smiles, shaking hands, trying to appear as positive as possible even if they world is burning. Everyone has to appear "professional" and handle any given situation surgically even if it all goes to shit. There are strict rules much like computer programming and if one violates them then they are discarded much like we do to a bug. The system for us owes to be smooth and functional.

We need to understand that this capitalistic notion with our relationships flows in every single part of society. Our friends, family, employers and the grocery man next door, all operate on a given marketing realm that aims to generate profit in some way or another. When you see someone helping a fellow being is because they feel good doing it. They are building social capital from the values that they have aquired from society. We are social animals. Everyone enjoys helping others, just not every single person and not every single time. In the same respect, we enjoy hurting others that might threaten our values. The only thing that changes in any given circumstance is the value we assign to our interactions.





Every single relationship on earth, for every species, is based on demand and supply. I did try to see the world through the romantic idea, the idealised human perspective. It fails miserably long term because all values of romanticism are based on exaggerated symbolism. Consider for example the act of bringing dead flowers to someone as a symbol for love. The act itself is a meme, that both parties have to abide. They both know what the act ultimately symbolises but parties choose to engage in this form instead of saying to each other that they want to fuck. The reality that both have assets that are valued and desired (body or mind), is bypassed since it appears to be vulgar. We tend to deny our capitalistic nature because it makes us sound brute, unrefined, much like the rest of animals. We can deny reality all we wish but we cannot deny the consequences of denying reality. Romanticism fails in the long run because its symbols betray reality.

There is nothing wrong treating each other based on capitalistic ideas. Accepting the harsh truths about our world, how everything operates on demand and supply, is pivotal in bringing solutions that torment us. Avoiding reality for the sake of romanticism only makes our lives more troublesome. Those who abide to the romantic code, don't ultimately follow through. They can't afford it. Everything is built for and upon scarcity. This is how value is created. This is how evolution makes sure to reward some trends based on a given ecosystem while discarding others.







Sort:  

But what causes you to fall in love? And does it really matter what plays in the background, or is "instinct" you mentioned in a previous post perhaps a better guide in such things, to prevent a feeling of complete bleakness and emptiness? You get to choose what you accept as motivating causes, and some are more benign than others, even when rational thinking would lead you to other causes.

BTW you are very close here to the theme of Houellebecq's Extention du domaine de la lutte, in which he paints a portrait of a society where emotionless, neo-liberal market thinking has made its way into personal relationships, including romantic ones, not just as a background mechanism, but as a primary determinant of those relationships. You haven't read it, I know, but the direction of thinking is so strikingly similar I thought you would want to know about it. The book hit me like a ton of bricks, and a strong feeling of "do people really think about others like that?" and "don't want to be like that!". It also nearly caused riots in France, so he must have touched a nerve.

Last time i fell in love was for someone who was curious about how the world works. Didn't notice body or face that much but rather the way they framed reality. I saw her as a commodity nonetheless, one of value. I am not denying the state of the world. I am rather trying to factually illustrate it.

I really need to read that book now

I would have to force myself to see a person as a commodity, however valuable, but that might be just a matter of definition or simple reluctance to use economic terms for anything that is truly interesting. But to each his own.

His second book, with an overlapping theme, is called Les Particules élémentaires, equally hard-hitting, to me at least. And no, I have no shares in his publisher 8-).

I agree this is a problem mostly of definition. What we end up loving in other people is the values we aspire. In a way we reflect on an empty shell and assign value. This is how they become so dear to us. In a way it is an elaborate act of masturbation. Rarely anybody enjoys the act but we all enjoy its outcome. At the end it is the raw instinctual consumption of someone else much like food. We devour their subjectiveness and then extrude what is not needed.

Lovely post.

Avoiding reality for the sake of romanticism only makes our lives more troublesome.

Been there. Boy, that feels good. But reality always played the game differently.

Everything is built for and upon scarcity. This is how value is created.

Plus, anyone who offers these value, is valuable, and has many options in life.

Quarrelling and disagreement is an important part of keeping each other in check. A friend or lover who just agrees with you all the time is actually doing you a disservice.

On the more basic point of all relationships being a kind of transaction I think you are spot on. I think many people will find this uncomfortable to face though.

We like to consider ourselves to be higher beings - almost God like in nobility when we are basically just gorillas in pants.

https://twitter.com/Soul_Eater_43/status/863091733193797632

"gorillas in pants". Allow me to quote you on this in the future. awesome analogy.

Soul_Eater_43 The Cryptofiend tweeted @ 12 May 2017 - 18:01 UTC

Controversial blog post from @kyriacos : The Capitalism In Our #Relationships@Steemit buff.ly/2ranPb0twitter.com/i/web/status/8…

Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.

Goodness, what food for thought @kyriacos. Are you familiar with the work of the documentary director Adam Curtis? All is work is excellent, but I highly recommend "the Trap", which is available to watch on Youtube.

Thank you @brameld. I always appreciate comments that suggest new reading/watching. This is how i am able to form new posts. I will check him out.

Alain de Botton has a great talk about how Romanticism has failed us. I agree with much of what you said here, but since you seem to value quarrel and conflict so highly, I'll just mention the things I take issue with. ;)

and someone is bound to fail for someone else to succeed.

I call bullshit. This zero-sum game thinking does not fit reality. As we innovate, the pie grows and cooperation far exceeds competition as far as increasing human wellbeing.

Everyone has brought smiles, shaking hands, trying to appear as positive as possible even if they world is burning. Everyone has to appear "professional" and handle any given situation surgically even if it all goes to shit. There are strict rules much like computer programming and if one violates them then they are discarded much like we do to a bug.

If so, that's a potentially dysfunctional company (IMO). Read books like the 5 dysfunctions of a team or many other professional management books to realize successful companies do not usually operate this way in the boardroom. They'll have full blown yelling fights in their meetings but leave the room on the same page and working towards a shared goal because all sides were heard and passionately debated. Avoiding things or playing nice is not effective. (I've run my own company for 10 years with a business partner so I also have some personal experience in this area).

In the same respect, we enjoy hurting others that might threaten our values.

Don't count me in that "we" at all. I think determinism requires of us a level of understanding towards others which has no room for guilt, shame, or (worse) enjoyment at the pain of other conscious beings. We could have been them. There are other ways to deal with conflict such as NVC.

I agree "altruism" (philosophically speaking) isn't much more than selfishly creating the world someone prefers to live in, but I'm not sure the "capitalist" language is ideal because relational capital is different than currency. Humans are not objects and if we treat them as such, it creates relational friction which hinders authenticity. The balance, I think, is recognizing how people benefit us and how we benefit others, use accurate language for those interactions, and still not treat people as things to be bought and sold.

You know me. Always looking for a challenge.

I completely agree about the zero game thing. The zero game fallacy has been debunked over and over again. Nonetheless, what i mean in my statement is that, at least momentarily and on specific domains one will have to fail and another will succeed. This is best illustrated with the fact that today 2/3 of the world do not have shelter, food and water on a daily basis but due to recent developments capitalism, they are better of compared to 100 years ago. Even though they are used extensively from western development, within their societies they prosper competing on their "level". The loser is this case is algorithmically defined from our level but this does not apply in their own level.

As far as company cultures go, most of them operate on that rule. It is not the exception. Its all good in theory with seminars and all but in practise is extremely hard to apply due to the high volatility of human nature

When i said " we enjoy hurting others" i meant that in a given situation where our values are threatened ( e.g children) we will enjoy the act of defensive killing of those who threaten them due to the transference of our emotion into something as pure as defending children. This is exactly how all atrocities take place. They are acts of presumed benevolent defence but in the neutral eye they appear horrific.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.27
TRX 0.13
JST 0.032
BTC 60826.65
ETH 2907.17
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.54