You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Delegating to Bid Bots
but I've learned through experience that if you're forced to play a game you didn't sign up for; you're best option is to win it.
Everyone thinks they're on the path to winning it, but in the end we all will lose (if everyone goes that way). But yeah, that's not happening yet, but this is a slight concern without further information about how the stake intends to be used.
I have no concern, personally, for how another grown adult spends his own money — save they intend to physically attack someone, rape, bomb, etc.
That said, Steemit is not what people think it is or was. Find out now or later.
Lastly, I how a person behaves in their banking space, even though it may effect my fees, if I'm their friend or their fan, then I feel it would be very self centered of me to imply that I'm only his friend because he falls in line with my investment agenda.
So yeah, agree to disagree, no offense.
Yeah it sounds like we will have to agree to disagree. I don't think it's what you think it is either.
It's actually in everyone's best interest to make the platform attractive to both users and investors because one cannot survive without the other. Just food for thought.
Well, I'm not sure where you presume I stand. But you're right, I don't have everyone's best interest at heart. My heart is just not that big.
Further, we cannot make "this" platform anything. Steemit.com is just one browsing interface to the entire blockchain, and Steemit Inc has decided what it is going to do already with condenser, and thus what the results will be.
In addition, post-SMT, there will be THOUSANDS of new coins and dapps and users absolutely flooding this blockchain with all types of uncensored content.
None of the proposed changes involve the dynamics that folks have claimed are unfavorable to everyone, which means specifically them. So competition for the reward pool, capitalism, free market contracts, bots, self-voting, vote-selling, and more will all continue well through HF20 — except it will be 1000 daps and 10 Million users.
And my entire point is, that I'm a fan of @acidyo's content. I'm not a fan because of how his choices effect the Steem in my wallet. So if he wants to make a bot, I'm going to use it.
I feel smaller accounts (redfish, minnows, dolphin) are wisest to use this present pre-fork opportunity to power up as quickly as possible.
You are right. I only want to point out that self interest activity is not sustainable if everyone does it. That's what makes this all painfully.... Hum. I don't have a word for it.
But I don't think that's a reason to simply give up on calling out the behavior. Being silent is worse than being predictably against certain behavior.
And also I am holding my breath here a bit because I don't know the details of this new fangled bid bot. I imagine it's an inch better than the status quo though.