Well, well, well...here we have another case where everybody else was lying except Deborah Jones and her daughter. All these professionally educated people just woke up one day and decided to be liars and fabricated evidence against her daughter to take away her child.

Deborah Williams had her children taken from her because she claims her son lied against her because he wanted to go live with his father in Canada. CPS showed up at school and interrogated not one but all three of the children. Now logically it would seem to me that if the other two kids were telling a different story then the one this would have been an easy case to solve. It would logically seem that the other two would say that their brother made up the stories because he'd prefer to live with dad. But that didn't happen evidently, evidently they had similar allegations towards their mother also. So the children are
put into the system, it doesn't really say they ended up going to Canada to live with the father so we can't just assume that's how that turned out...but what we do know is the children were in their early teens and ended up going back home to mom two years later. Since it doesn't detail when the children wrote the letters saying they never said the things that were said we can assume it may have occurred after they returned for all that matters. Now forgive me if I am wrong but it was at this point that somehow the mom's daughter became a coke head, someone who uses cocaine, it doesn't really state if her daughter became pregnant while underage and under her care but none the less she became pregnant and decided to use drugs that were detrimental to the baby's health while she was carrying the baby. Cocaine was found in the baby's system when born. This is when the two of them said those who worked at the hospital conspired against them by decided to band together and lie on them and forge documents to that effect. In the meantime "grandma" decided she was going to go for custody because family has first choice. Well that is true except in the state of Michigan when "grandma" has her own child abuse record she is no longer eligible as a first choice option. Hence why "grandmothers" distrust of the system would be another completely logical conclusion as to the inclusion in the reasons behind the decision not to grant "grandma" the child. Since a lot of this is running on hearsay and assumptions we could carry that into assuming maybe her daughter was a minor at the time she had the child, therefore her daughter would still be living with her, that may be another reason taken into consideration. Just like we could also just assume that the father of the child sex offense is maybe he engaged as an adult with sex with her daughter. He wasn't given custody of the child as it seems to appear in the article just visitation. Which, (assuming) if she was a minor, say sixteen and he was nineteen or twenty that would get him in trouble for having sex with a minor but it doesn't necessarily mean he's a pedophile baby raper.

So "grandma" and "daughter" decide to join in testimony on the wrongs done by CPS....but you know what, it's been ten years now and I've yet to see any blaring headlines screaming across the news that these two knuckleheads have won million dollar judgments against the state. I wonder why that is.