You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Flat Earth: Lake Pontchartrain Marriott Hotel Photo Modeled and Analyzed.

in #flatearth6 years ago

You didn't figure in the BASE of the height of the marriott. And i doubt your model figured in horizon drop. This is just first glance.

heath_marriott.png

heath_hidden_marriott.png

https://www.metabunk.org/curve/

So, just on first glance that you did not take the base of the height of the marriott over the lake into account

Here is his theodolite image with the horizon drop. I'm not sure if you understand this, but that RIGHT THERE debunks the flat earth! Horizon drop IS the curvature!

horizon_marriott_heath_carmody.png

Then, if you were to take an image of the Marriott and superimpose it, there is a HUGE amount of the building missing! At least 1/3 of the building is obscured. And even your calc says that about 260 feet should be missing. But you didn't take the height above the lake into account either! That would be imperative.

In any case, perhaps there is a BIT of the building that should be missing more than the calc says, but it's within 50 or so feet of the calc that even YOU did!

heath_carmody_marriott_edited.png

and from YOUR OWN VIDEO, when you went higher in elevation, I caught the almost EXACT image that Jesse got and it was at an elevation of 6. 9 meters. I actually think it could have gone up just SLIGHTLY higher to capture it perfectly, but you put your text right over the top of the image so I couldn't see it. But it might have been a meter or two higher to get it exactly right.

The height you used is 4.65 meters. That is 3. 25 meters from nearly perfectly capturing what he did. Lets add 2 meters to that for 5-6 meters off of exactly what Jesse was showing. Which would be easily explainable by the height of the Marriott above the lake that you didn't calculate!

heath_carmody_marriott_height_6.9_meters.png

So, I don't see how you can conclude that this is not consistent with the globe. A calculation of about 1% is a legitimate amount off due to reasonable errors. But this one is nearly spot on. It's around 6 METERS off your own calculations and you are saying that is inconsistent with the globe!

You have yet to show any calcs with verified heights and distances that are 50-1000% off, as would be expected on a flat earth.

You take an error rate of 6 meters and declare that it's inconsistent with the globe! That seems completely dishonest and biased. And you ignore the fact that the horizon drop right in front of you debunks the flat earth entirely!

You literally debunked yourself. 6 meters difference and you failed to take the base of the Marriott into account! I honestly think you should do a retraction video and say you are incorrect and that it is perfectly consistent with the globe!

Sort:  

Sorry for the late reply there was a lot here and I never got around to it until now. I'll do a post soon and show any of my errors referenced in your comment. Thanks for the detailed response.

I made a new post responding to your comment. Hope you check it out!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.27
TRX 0.12
JST 0.032
BTC 67405.50
ETH 3119.11
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.73