You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Mission Impossible 3 (film): I think it is the best one

in #getyerlearnon6 years ago

JJ Abrams combined the best elements of the previous parts, practically getting rid of their shortcomings. Before us an interesting and exciting action without excessive show-off with explosions and slow-motion shooting. Actually, this is the main merit of Abrams - I can not name any of his brilliant films, but I can not name any bad. If he faced the task of finding the golden mean between the first two parts, he performed it without any genius, but as qualitatively as possible. In this case, however, adding a bit of melodrama from yourself.
The main advantage of the third part, I think her main villain. Hoffman perfectly got used to the image and flawlessly fits into his role, if you forget about the final fight, which somewhat smears the impression. Still, this character should not go down to a banal massacre. Among the other actors, I would like to mention Myers, let it not be his brightest role, but Laurence Fishburne is still the worst of all the bosses, in my opinion. Michelle Monaghan is ideal for the role of an ordinary American wife, but outwardly inferior to the girls from the past, and significantly.
I liked that it was here that a normal division into mini-missions appeared and a wide geography of filming with enough recognizable landscapes, let Berlin and did not allow to realize the original idea with the Bundestag. Shanghai is good and like new skyscrapers, and as tiny houses in the old districts - cool, that we were shown by both sides of this city. In general, having solved the problem with the shortcomings of the first two parts, the film lost some of its originality, so I can not call it tangible progress, but from the whole trilogy it turned out to be the most smooth in the aspect of combining the visual series and the script.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.31
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 63747.88
ETH 3130.43
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.89