You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Ignorance is Bliss, Especially where the "Steem" Token is Concerned
While I would enjoy a more positve outlook I dont think the article was this bad or unfair written.
Yes, a mention of the gambling dapps or especially the recent very successfully funded IEO of Steemhunt should have been mentioned for sure but I think this will stay in the inner circle of Steemians for a while as I think you notice something like this more if you spend time here daily, which I am pretty sure the author does not.
Nevertheless if the whole crypto space is seen kind of negative I guess a 6.3 is not too bad.
I am already impressed he knew the different between Steem and Steemit.
The only problem I saw was the article not portraying the full picture. Like you said, you need to spend a certain amount of time on Steemit to get that fuller picture. Therefore his extremely premature assertions of Steem* being a bad investment, are founded in incomplete truths. In fairness, it does impart a lot of useful information, but in a skewed context, which I found unnecessary.
I see the whole crypto space as being too early on to decide you the winners or losers will be.
Thanks for your input, buddy. :)