You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 4: Look Up (Documenting Geoengineering)
Interesting as always, scary as hell. Great for keeping us informed. Great to put the word out. I think it needs to go other places though, seems Steemians are on to it. What I would love to know from everyone posting about this...is............what does a non geo sky look like? Why do some of the people posting think there should not be clouds? Scientific answers or non scientific will work. Just answers.
I'll take some shots of that for you, it's funny I was going to the other day, it was so beautiful, the sky a crisp, dark blue and puffy clouds here and there. No persistent trails coming from the planes.
As for posting about geoengineering and for it needing to go other places, it's all over the place, we've been posting about it for almost a decade now on facebook/twitter/youtube. It needs to be on the blockchain, where it can never be deleted or censored.
ok...I did not mean facebook. I meant in a magazine or newspaper. But yes there needs to be pictures of geo and non geo so people can see the difference. I can bet you a lot of people think that the sky is always looking like it should. There are lots of magazines and newspapers and books that expose all this type of stuff.
It's a good idea, thanks for sharing Marion! By the way, you may not know, but geoengineering is more mainstream that anyone thinks. You can study it at Harvard... https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/
yes. I knew that and I have read that site and their articles. I have also read David Suzuki things. I just think most people just think the sky looks the way the sky looks.
Hi @marionbowes I would recommend you to take a look at the website climateviewer.com
There you will find tons of references (I mean scientific papers; of course there are also videos and other documents like FOAIs, patents etc.). In the older articles sometimes a link will not work but usually the most are active. Sometimes only the archived version because the sites were taken off.
From there on out it is also possible to look further at the works of institutes like the mentioned harvard one.
Jim Lee of climateviewer has two further websites:
For his stance on chemtrails - no chemtrails? -, see
https://climateviewer.com/cirruscloudsmatter/
It took me longer than that to fully figure out what his stance is (this FAQ alone was not efficient enough in the end :D), the article on slavespeak or own reflections on what is said in this FAQ might be helpful.
@lyndsaybowes ever heard of the work of Jim Lee? Watching your video I’d say it miiight be the case. If not, his work would probably resonate with you :)!
This photo I took several weeks ago around noon. Clear blue sky and then these lines appeared.
I’ve learned to refrain from speaking of chemtrails and would rather say, if asked: „Clearly this would have remained a clear blue sky if no planes had been flying that day (and everything else being equal).“ Half of those I did see being made from afar; would be very unreasonable to assume the other ones hadn’t been made by planes as well.
I didn’t find arguments for or about chemtrails or websites publishing about them very reasonable before I found Jim Lee anyway (I never shunned chemtrail people though).
P.3 of this article was my background picture as I started writing on steemit :D. (download the pdf for better reading)
This one about the same project has also an interesting pic on p.3 :D (found via a search for it afresh).
I believe he is probably one of those channels who is shadow-banned for a very long time and lots of us are from time to time doing promo for the guys of altmedia who get pushed underground, so I very often do promo for him because his work is so outstanding and seems absolutely underrated to me.
If you watch videos, he has them also on Bit.tube so why not make an account there and earn you and him tube while watching instead of using ThemTube.
Excellent comment @mielia!