You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Next Colony Exploration Let Downs

in #nextcolony5 years ago

I suspect the RNG is based too much on nickname. There are 2 kinds of players here: extremely lucky and players with 0 colonies after hundreds of explorations. It is strange :/

Sort:  


Coincidence?

I was twice in a row for lost explorers so it makes sense to me.

Posted using Partiko Android

Haha. I think people with average results are just quiet and people with interesting nicknames are more memorable.
I read a post by the wise @holger80 about why planets tend to be near planets https://steemit.com/nextcolony/@holger80/nextcolony-checking-if-the-8-explored-planets-are-valid
It turns out people look there first.

The solution if you find many planets is to get on that leaderboard and use your luck to control the galaxy. It's a chance those of us who are unlucky can only dream of.

Posted using Partiko Android

I read a post by the wise @holger80 about why planets tend to be near planets https://steemit.com/nextcolony/@holger80/nextcolony-checking-if-the-8-explored-planets-are-valid
It turns out people look there first.

It does not make sense. Localization is not related to timeframe. Some people are extremely lucky - no matter where they send Explorers.
I know the formula is fine (md5 hash as a random seed), however the results are awkward :/

Very awkward. 2 planets is twice the production ability. It's a lot of RNG advantage

Posted using Partiko Android

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.28
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 62258.08
ETH 3157.97
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.78