You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Art of the Incredible Artist Wlop/ NTOPAZ TALENT CURATION.
Do you have permission by the artist to monetize his art?
Also:
"Participation Rules
Choose [CO] type and upload.
You must specify the origin and origin.(Social media is limited to works that are allowed to be shared.)
Limited to the work curated to participate in the contest.
Up to 3 artworks per person is allowed to submit.
Must be uploaded on the contest page on nTOPAZ.com.
Please refer to link on how to participate in a contest.
"
Source: https://steemit.com/ntopaz/@ntopaz/talent-curation-contest
How did you established that the works you show are allowed by the artist to be shared for commercial purposes?
Its amazing you are an art curator for @ntopaz and you dont even respect the rules....
Excuse the intrusion, I just read the rules of the contest, and this only ask to show who is the author and that the knowledge of the social networks of the author of the works, this participant is not a violation of the rule of this healing contest, from my point of view.
Then, if he causes it for these reasons, then he would have to accuse all the other participants
Read the part in BOLD
A curation post is a commentary on an existing work. She has followed the guidelines. Fair Use
The rules clearly say that the material used needs to be allowed to shared(by the author) in this case commercially obviously.
This posts would need to be in decline.or have permission by the author, otherwise, by allowing this you guys are exposing ntopaz and all the front ends to DMCA takedown notices, which I assume is not what Ntopaz intends.
I'm waiting for @ntopaz to clarify that part. Posts that serve as reviews, commentary or critics fall under fair use as far as I know. Otherwise you have to increase your scope to posts do film reviews, anime reviews, and game reviews. The content is not the art but the review. The sources are there and the author has clearly stated they do not own it.