You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Poking the Hornet's Nest the right way

in #philosophy6 years ago

I guess you are not necessarily wrong with that observation.... but it might be more accurate to say you people who enter the arena should just make sure they have sound arguments (weapons) and don't get caught arguing from ignorance (bluffing).

But I get your analogy.

Sort:  

It came out a bit hyperbolic, I'm new to these discussions and it will surly show. I agree that how you put it sounds better. Learning the tools (less violent analogy yes?) of the argument are very key. I'd say some that are on the positive side are to point to scientific research results or to use historical rebuttals and the bluffs or negatives are straw man arguments and ad homonym attacks but the list goes on. This is the discussion I've been looking for and I really appreciate your time and engagement, please let me know if I'm on the right track with it.

I believe you to be for sure.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.27
TRX 0.13
JST 0.032
BTC 64802.57
ETH 2975.30
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.69