Well from what I see on this list I guess you don’t consider a community manually curating on the behalf of that account to be “manual curating.” With large sums of SP that is quite the responsibility for a single person to take on all alone. I think the whole column “manual curator” is quite misleading.
Sorry but you 50% people are crazy in my eyes. If you think trying shift the 22% or whatever they control out of the bidbots to a 25% higher curation is going fix things. Most of those people don’t have the time, resources, and let’s face it they make more money off Steemit then we could ever offer on. It’s just an investment for many of them.
The answer is not to pay them more dividends on their investment. It’s for the base value of their investment to skyrocket. We keep destroying the platform over dividends. If your stock crashes by 90% but hey we pay out a higher dividends. That does not make up for it.
Correct. What should i re-name the column? Steemit content curator?
No i don't think that will fix things, and it's more hope based on remarks these past few weeks that existing accounts will curate more. Right now I think it's new investment that is required - New SP holders that are not selling votes.