You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Potential problems with App beneficiaries
oh, I just used them as an example because they are known (i thought they still had the 25%), this is about the beneficiaries in general though, with or without delegation. I think the apps have to be able to offer more incentive than an upvote from the app anyway.
I haven't had much to do with @heimindanger directly but, from what I have seen of him on the platform, he conducts himself well.
Well according to https://steemd.com/@dtube they are still taking a cut.
am I missing something?
They do redistribute a bunch of that to voters through their own curation system, rather than keeping it. I don't know what the percentages are but it shouldn't be too hard to check.
@krnel @tarazkp it appears that DTube's entire cut goes to their secondary curation system. See this post: https://steemit.com/steem/@tcpolymath/math-of-steem-how-much-curation-does-dtube-pay-out
Yes, @macron mentioned this. As I said, @dtube was an example but even with it going to curators, the same concerns for posters exist. I like the idea of the distribution and I wonder if curation has changed because of it, especially curation through the @dtube interface. I don't know how easy it is to see that but maybe @heimindanger has an idea?
yea, he really is a standup guy. It was really interesting to have a talk with someone who 'gets' the system.
That is also why they went back from this 25%, the realisation that it is in fact not sustainable.
Personally I think a small (really small) beneficiary is acceptable, or at least it would be to me if they provide a service that warrants that.