You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why abusers can not win on Steem!

in #steemit6 years ago

You have a minor misspelling in the following sentence:

Their reputations drop, they do not invest as much SP as we do and therefor we can remove them easily!
It should be therefore instead of therefor.

Sort:  

You realize you will get no one to like you correcting them for no reason right?

I love @grammarnazi and I find his service very useful!

Maybe I'm a perfectionist, but an "e" less in a word, it seems to me a good reason to report and give you the opportunity to improve, right?

Maybe if it was a human who was adding input and just mentioned the typo it wouldn't be so annoying to most. But I think based on the fact that @grammarnazi went from 25 starting reputation to now 14 is proof people don't want it. We dont (yes I missed that ' on purpose) want or need someone doing that to us in an automated fashion. ADD value read our post and THEN grammar nazi me but don't use a robot to do it.. This comment was posted seconds after I made the post there is no way it was not automated.

@grammarnazy is a bot developed by @oyvindsabo.

Take a look at this article and their comments, @bigdeej! ;)

A big hug from @amico!

And I will talk how ever I done choose to! I dont want nor need no grammar nazi bot and as I said it appears most people agree seein as how its at 14 reputation score lol (59 for me and 43 for you). Seems people like your REAL human input and do NOT like a bot that all it does it spellcheck like gee the chrome box already does for me... If i CARED I would have proofread it myself duh! This be social media not oxford!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.29
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 64107.66
ETH 3148.40
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.84