You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: I'm a little jealous over ONO's marketing.
To me, the biggest advantage ONO will have is the permanently open payment window... I understand Steem has its own reasons for cutting the vote availability to older content, but as someone who has made a few very time-consuming posts, ONO's model is very appealing.
I'm hoping there will be a SMT solution for great content that no longer fits the 7 day rules, since I'm still big on Steem!
I'd really like to understand the why's of Steem's lack of marketing or even an active Twitter presence... I just hope it doesn't backfire in the long-run :-/
And, as much as I hate to say it, get ready for a bunch of cheap knock-offs of the Steem blockchain. That's what concerns me the most.
That is a good point regarding the long-term payouts. Many Content Creators have talked about that issue for a long time!
From what I've heard, SMTs can be a testing ground for different payout models, I think it'd make good sense to offer (in some way) what other competing platforms intend to offer... Maybe the "GPT" will have a wider pay window - or none at all...
That would be a sign that STEEM is doing something right...no-one copies a failing project .