Anti-Intellectualism and the Willingly Worn Bonds of Self-Oppression

in #truth6 years ago (edited)

photo-1521437100987-e1cb2178879b.jpg
One need only look around to see various forms of anti-intellectualism. Some people view certain knowledge as immoral and its pursuit as frivolous. Others think that only "useful" learning is worth while (I wrote about this attitude recently). Many more will avoid any information that conflicts with their previously held beliefs out of fear of contaminating their world view. The reason that a person shuns learning is less important than the effect of this anti-intellectualism. When one willingly walks away from knowledge, he or she hinders his or her ability to question the authorities who benefit from ignorance. Without the desire to learn and the drive to think critically, a person enters into a state of soft servitude. By ignoring information, one casts away the key to his or her mental bonds and bows to the powers who exploit us, free from thought and the resistance that it brings. However, if we understand why anti-intellectualism exists and reject those causes we can liberate ourselves from its self-imposed oppression.

There are numerous things that drive people away from learning. Sometimes people are told that knowledge is the enemy of belief and they accept this to be true because they lack the necessary knowledge to examine that claim. Some political groups claim that the "other side" controls education and will "brain wash" anyone who wishes to learn but learning a piece of information and accepting it as the hard and only truth are two entirely different things. Knowledge may be deemed as immoral or dangerous and people who believe that lie avoid the "offending" information. These reasons for ignorance may seem like separate phenomena but they all share a commonality. Simply put, all of these types of anti-intellectualism work to the benefit of systems of authority which require the blind obedience of the masses.

photo-1521481137585-72bf570cff34.png

In reality there is no such thing as negative knowledge. If a thing is true, it can stand against questions and competing ideas and if it is false, that fact will quickly become apparent. It doesn't matter what a person's beliefs, political views, or what have you are, he or she has nothing to fear in becoming educated. If the things which he or she learns, conflict with his or her beliefs, the two ideas will come into conflict and the truth will emerge as the victor. In some cases, this changes nothing and in others, it alters the way one approaches the world but neither outcome is negative. New information is gathered its value is determined, and it is integrated or rejected accordingly. There is no reason for a person to avoid any information because he or she is always better for having learned it.

Of course, systems of authority will view this issue differently. Authorities often don't deserve the power that they hold. When people start to question them and use knowledge and logic to evaluate the false claims and misinformed beliefs which they rely on, their position is poisoned. When people have the necessary knowledge to notice that the authorities are unworthy, the noble protectors and benevolent leaders start to look like corrupt oppressors and cruel masters. The enemies of truth know that this is the case. They have not hidden the truth from themselves and they exploit their knowledge to prevent others from becoming their intellectual equals. An unworthy conservative authority may tell his or her followers that liberal knowledge will infect their children's minds and they shouldn't send them to college. An unworthy liberal authority may tell his or he followers that conservative voices lend legitimacy to wrong headed ideas and they must not listen to them lest they be "corrupted" themselves. I could go on saying that X says this or that and Y is ignored as a result but I suspect the point is clear. People whose power relies on blind obeisance will use their power to lead others away from learning. Be assured, if anyone says that learning a thing is wrong, it is likely out of a fear of knowledge and that is all the more reason for one to seek it out.

photo-1461783436728-0a9217714694.jpg

The solution is, thankfully, simple. All one must do to be free from the self-imposed oppression of anti-intellectualism is be willing to listen, learn, and reflect. Some ideas will be good and some will not. Some information will be truer than other information. It doesn't matter what the subject or source of the knowledge is because if a thing is correct, it can stand on its own and if it is false, it will collapse under the weight of its flaws. Learn everything and be liberated.

Peace.

Unless otherwise credited, all the images in this post were sourced from the free image website, unsplash.com.

Sort:  

I would really recommend to you the book The Righteous Mind, which talks about moral reasoning (socio/political/etc) - that basically decision making is as follows: intuitive/gut feeling --> judgement/decision --> post hoc reasoning. It is very atypical for people to put deep consideration into the choices or ideas they make/hold. Most people's world view is coloured by the tribe/community they associate with. Intellectual honesty and the pursuit of knowledge/truth is a very narrow in the sense that most people will only educate themselves in a way that justifies their preconceived ideas that are in line with their associated tribe(ie. confirmation bias). This is not insurmountable nor am I trying to be nihilistic, I just find it an interesting psychological understanding of how people work. It just means that reason and truth alone is not a strong enough pull for most people. And more to the point of your article, it helps explain why some will choose to only pursue certain kinds of education/knowledge.

I'll be checking that book out, thanks!

I agree with the overall reality that many people have a high likelihood that they will remain in a certain hivemind. I do, however, hope that the acknowledging that misinformation is all around us in modern society, can give rise to a renewed locus of responsibility within individuals and less willingness to sacrifice a personal view to belong to a group.

I'll have to check that out.

Here I didn't touch on the internal side of this issue very much but that would be worth covering because it does play a role. What sent me off writing this were some old episodes of a podcast that would cover crazy people's videos as material to pick apart. On that show, they played some clips from the 700 club where people were essentally told that they should burn this book or that book and that one should beat their kid if they ask this question or that question.

When I was in college, occasionally, some people would ask me why I was taking classes in anthropology and literature. What was it that I was planning to do after I graduated? Why did I end up with a double BA and keep taking classes even though I could have graduated a year earlier than I did? I'd mumble that it was cheaper to take undergraduate classes than graduate classes, so it was better to delay graduation as long as possible. The same people would shake their heads and dismiss my explanation as the product of too much Macro.

Be that as it may, as years went by, a number of the supposed "useless" classes I took helped qualify me to teach some 100-level courses at a few overseas American university branch campuses.

Study whatever you want, all knowledge helps us as we wander through the fog of existence.

I love your line: "Learn everything and be liberated."

Thank you. Yeah sometimes that stuff comes in handy sometimes. I once worked a horrible telemarketing job and I use argumenitive techniques that I learned all the time. I guess you never know what is going to pay off at some point.

The anti-learning attitude is more common than people think. The thing that comes to mind is some southerner who "don't need no books" but pretty much any group with an ideology has some taboo knowledge or subject.

I grew up with a skeptical mind in a religious, "respect your elders" household that would meet many inquiries with "because I said so". At the time, I wanted to be a good child and please so I would accept and push away reasoning. I have dragged myself out of that sesspool, but critical thinking and effective debate skills had some serious growing to do once I ended that period of my life. I have been working hard but I don't think many people understand how big of a hurdle they place in front of someone when they demand this anti-intellectualism. Won't put myself through a telemarketing position, as it would be a terrible match for my strengths, but I am always looking for knowledge to grow deeper in my understanding of myself and my communities through meaningful discussion, especially over the uncomfortable topics like this.

Congratulations @artisticscreech! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of comments received

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Upvote this notification to help all Steemit users. Learn why here!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.034
BTC 63877.55
ETH 3143.56
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.97