I completely agree sir. Although, if I hadn't have read the Government non-sense then I would not have realised how much of a crime this was and how the passing of Acts in fiat (which also got Royal Assent while Government was dissolved) has led to the most draconian measures that we did not agree to. For example:

9 Administration of medicine to persons liable to detention in hospital

(1) The approved clinician in charge of treatment within section 58(1)(b) (administration of medicine for more than three months) may give a certificate under section 58(3)(b) (appropriateness of TREATMENT WITHOUT CONSENT) if the clinician considers that complying with the requirement under that provision for the certificate to be given by a registered medical practitioner other than that clinician or the responsible clinician is impractical or would involve undesirable delay.

10 Administration of medicine

Medicine (as defined in section 240) may be given to a patient without a certificate under section 241(1) if the patient’s responsible medical officer has requested a certificate from a designated medical practitioner but the practitioner has not yet issued a certificate (and a certificate has not been
refused).

This is what scared me in to writing numerous articles and researching the UK Bill of Rights, our Human Rights and the science of Coronaviruses and exosomes and they have breached both the Bill of Rights and the Human Rights Act and over stepped their democractic mandate by even suggesting mandated vaccines as a social passport back into the workplace. So, once again, I cannot agree more that this is a crime against humanity and a matter of international concern.