You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: WikiLeaks' New Rules: Suing Fake News Producers
I follow you and know we fully disagree on this, but I still think Wikileaks is all a big con!
Assange supports the bullshit 9/11 official story, has praised Netanyahu the evil zionist psychopath, and has never released any damaging info on Israel (that wasn't already published). Controlled opposition much?
I didn't know he supports Israel. That stinks big time. Not everyone can see the reality of the world, even though they have done some good. Rather than controlled opposition, just ignorance and attachment to certain ideas that prevent accurate perception, is how I see it.
I have to say I think Assange is a full on puppet and nothing about him from the cult childhood on rings true...
"Wikileaks, founded by Julian Assange, has become one of the biggest ‘whistle-blowing’ agencies in modern history. In reality though, it is one of the biggest disinformation projects in modern history, and it may be the most dangerous because it is masquerading as an organization of truth. The information released by Wikileaks isn’t new; it isn’t groundbreaking; it doesn’t hurt the US as much as people think, and it is overloaded with as much as propaganda as the day-to-day zionist media is."
http://www.maskofzion.com/2010/10/wikileaks-is-zionist-poison.html
in what context did he praise Nethanyahu? If a total idiot does something good then that good should be rewarded, it does not mean that this justifies all the other BS.
Once he receives leaks about / from israel that are damaging i'm sure that wikileaks will publish it. Though you can't publish what you don't have. It first needs the documents, then it needs a person that actually leaks, But the person who leaks it can also choose NOT lo leak it to wikileaks But to NewYorkTimes or The Guardian or any other media outlet (good or bad). So that agument needs a lot more support to get me convinced.
Same with the 9/11 argument, Just go to wikileaks and lookup a few 9/11 related docs.
To me your arguments sound like you got your information straight from the shitstream media. (sounds like, but I really hope it is not)
Julian is all about the truth and being unbiassed, so i really wonder where that 9/11 argument came from.
I'm really curious, who wrote that, and in what context, and under what circumstances that was wtitten. Even better would be an audio clip where Julian says it himself (again in the full context)
Let the truth come forward...
Wikileaks Is A Zionist Cover Up Operation – the Julian Assange Hoax
Funny how the videos all get censored by youtub!
http://mediawhores.co.nz/2017/01/21/wikileaks-is-a-zionist-cover-up-operation-the-julian-assange-hoax/
So what does this proof?
Come on, you should do MUCH better then that to make your point.
Thanks for trolling me! :-)
Great response